Canonical Voices

spamaps

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

Other Topics

  • Reviewing the action for ALL to check for verification-needed bugs, the list has remained managable and the process seems mostly to be working.
  • Natty Development – Alpha2 is close, some WI’s may need to be postponed but nothing specific yet.
  • Kernel Team (smb) – EC2 t1.micro and i386 fixes for natty kernel are pending – should be in next kernel
  • SpamapS suggested adding an “Upcoming Events” section to the agenda for Ubuntu Server interested people to talk about and coordinate events they’ll be attending.
  • QA Team (hggdh), Community Team (kim0), and Documentation Team (sommer) representatives were all absent.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, February 1 at 16:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
s3hh

Agenda

Review ACTION points from previous meeting
ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bugs

http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html

Natty Development

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
Open Discussion
Announce next meeting date and time
Tuesday, February 1 2011 16:00 UTC

Minutes

The last full meeting had resulted in no new actions. The only action item was “ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bug” at http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html. This is carried forward at SpamapS’s suggestion. robbiew announced that Natty development is goin gwell and we’ve made great progress on work items.

smb is working on bug 686692 (natty kernel does not boot on ec2 t1.micro), but had not yet found a final solution. He also pushed a lucid SRU for bug 614853 (kernel panic divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP). Some discussion ensued on bug 704022 (“xen_emul_unplug=unnecessary on kernel cmdline is required in ec2 hvm”), to be continued offline.

Finally, the channel as a whole skillfully evaded the question “should ubuntu try to look like windows or Mac or neither?”.

Meeting Actions

ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bugs (carried over)

http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, January 25th at 16:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.

Log

[16:01] #startmeeting
[16:01] Meeting started at 10:01. The chair is hallyn.
[16:01] Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[16:01] *\o/* gooooo rally!
[16:01] hallyn: err, ok you can do it if you want. ;)
[16:02] [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:02] New Topic: Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:02] ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bugs
[16:02] http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html
[16:02] LINK received: http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html
[16:02] everyone rais your hands if you’re NOT guilty
[16:03] That one should, I think, roll forward for a bit longer so we remember that its important.
[16:03] at least until 10.04.2
[16:03] [ACTION] ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bugs
[16:03] ACTION received: ALL: please check the SRU tracker for ‘needs-verification’ bugs
[16:03] SpamapS: sounds good, i’ll try to remember to keep the link in with the action when i carry over
[16:04] robbiew to review ServerTeam wiki [carried over]
[16:04] i thought that was done?
[16:04] hm, is robbiew in?
[16:04] I recall him claiming he’d done it as well.
[16:04] o/
[16:04] hm, didn’t get updated on the meeting page…
[16:05] robbiew: ^ ServerTeam wiki all reviewed and uptodate?
[16:05] yeah i totally missed the boat on the server page
[16:06] yup…at least the external one
[16:06] zul: meaning action items aren’t updated? in that case let me search the logs for the real ction items
[16:07] Hi everyone!
[16:09] ShootEmUp: welcome!
[16:09] glad to be here
[16:10] feh, there, jan 4
[16:10] yay, there ARE no actions from the jan 4 meeting
[16:11] \o/
[16:11] so, barring objections (i.e. if i’m mistaken), i’ll move on
[16:11] none? what do they do in those meetings?
[16:11] [TOPIC] Natty Development
[16:11] New Topic: Natty Development
[16:11] ShootEmUp: play duke nukem
[16:11] robbiew: ^ over to you
[16:11] hallyn, what?
[16:12] * robbiew wonders why he covers the one topic he doesn’t do :P
[16:12] heh
[16:12] so we made great progress on work items
[16:12] charlie-tca!
[16:12] lots of Done’s, Postpones, and dropped
[16:12] all goodness
[16:12] I haven’t checked bugs yet
[16:13] but I usually know of the serious ones…from the irc pings and email
[16:13] that’s it!
[16:13] Thanks Mr. Narwhal!
[16:13] I have a topic to debate
[16:13] [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:13] New Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:13] ShootEmUp: if its not related to the current topic please hold it until Open Discussion
[16:13] ShootEmUp: wait till the end of the meeting for Open Discussion :)
[16:13] okay
[16:14] didn’t actually see hggdh today, is he around?
[16:14] guess not, moving on, i know smb is here :)
[16:14] [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:14] New Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:15] So I did some little stuff last week but have no paper records, hence I am not sure anymore what that was
[16:15] Currently working on bug 686692
[16:15] Launchpad bug 686692 in linux (Ubuntu Natty) “natty kernel does not boot on ec2 t1.micro” [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/686692
[16:16] which I can locally reproduce but not yet found a final solution
[16:16] smb, Is that the bug that only happend on t1.micro i386′s?
[16:16] just that it would boot if the mem= is a multiple of 4
[16:16] Daviey, t1.micro but I believe both i386 and x86_64
[16:16] ah
[16:17] They are doing something different with memory layout too. Just not sure this is just something that happens too or related
[16:17] any questions for smb?
[16:18] Other thing I pushed for SRU in lucid is the paper over approach for bug 614853
[16:18] Launchpad bug 614853 in linux-ec2 (Ubuntu) “kernel panic divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP” [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/614853
[16:18] To keep until we found/got a real solution
[16:19] smb, What nasty effects does it have?
[16:19] The current patch just avoids the divide by zero. While the variable in question is supposed to never be zero in the first place
[16:20] So I sent two patches for sru, the one preventing the divide and one sort of debug patch to yell when the variable is set/left zero
[16:21] smoser, Are you arround?
[16:21] o/
[16:21] yeah, smb, i agree with that.
[16:22] Just saw your bug 704022
[16:22] Launchpad bug 704022 in linux (Ubuntu) “xen_emul_unplug=unnecessary on kernel cmdline is required in ec2 hvm” [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/704022
[16:22] one thing i had considered would have been to just add the debugging bit, and let it crash
[16:22] Though I am a bit confused by the logs as the ones which say with option and working seem to contain drops into busybox as well
[16:22] even with info like “if you see this message, please add to bug at https://launcpad.net/…”
[16:23] smb i may have uploaded incorrect (un-trimmed) logs
[16:23] but it does fail
[16:23] smoser, What made me rethink a bit is that those affected people seem to run production severs with that and so maybe a avoid and complain is preferable
[16:24] yeah, so the reboot with argument i sjust not trimmed
[16:24] so it contains the previous boot log (thats why the busybox in the middle of it)
[16:24] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62372677/restart-with-unplug-arg.txt
[16:24] LINK received: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/62372677/restart-with-unplug-arg.txt
[16:24] smoser, Ah ok. That xvd* does not show up without the option is ok. Though one would think the sd* devices should always
[16:25] smb, yeah, i agree, getting people actually fixed is good, but if you fix the problem you’ll never get debug info
[16:25] they wont send it becuase they wont know they have a problem
[16:25] so do you want it changed? (let’s either make a decision, or move offline?)
[16:25] * SpamapS wonders if this couldn’t be discussed further offline?
[16:26] * SpamapS apologizes for smashing hallyn’s toes
[16:26] i can defer to smb’s decision.
[16:26] grrr
[16:26] ok – any other questions for smb?
[16:26] (or from)
[16:26] if not,
[16:26] I am done
[16:26] thanks, smb
[16:26] [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[16:26] New Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
[16:27] sommer is not around
[16:27] :(
[16:27] yup
[16:27] [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
[16:27] New Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
[16:27] kim0 is also not around
[16:27] and so, we move on to
[16:27] [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[16:27] New Topic: Open Discussion
[16:28] ShootEmUp: your turn
[16:28] should ubuntu try to look like windows or Mac or neither?
[16:28] lol
[16:29] ShootEmUp: you may want to ask that in #ubuntu
[16:29] like my old palm V
[16:29] ShootEmUp: indeed. This is the Server team meeting
[16:29] lol
[16:29] okay
[16:29] SpamapS: for some reason i thougth there was something you wanted to discuss?
[16:30] why does everybody always assume I want to TALK? ;)
[16:30] no I’m good
[16:30] :)
[16:30] wow, first time for everything! :)
[16:30] anybody? going once…
[16:30] SpamapS: because you are a chatty cathy
[16:30] zul: whatever you nervous nelly
[16:30] going twice…
[16:31] SpamapS: i know what you are but what am i?
[16:31] [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[16:31] New Topic: Announce next meeting date and time
[16:31] hm, the meeting page says feb 1
[16:31] i dont’ think that’s right
[16:31] I would have assumed:
[16:31] 25th
[16:31] Tuesday, January 25 2011 16:00 UTC
[16:32] ok, another almost action-free meeting.
[16:32] thanks all
[16:32] #endmeeting
[16:32] Meeting finished at 10:32.

MeetingLogs/Server/20110118 (last edited 2011-01-21 17:57:47 by Serge Hallyn)


Read more
Dustin Kirkland

Agenda
  • Review ACTION points from previous meeting
  • Natty Development
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
  • Open Discussion
  • Announce next meeting date and time

Minutes

  • Review ACTION points from previous meeting
    • ALL: please check the SRU tracker http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html for ‘needs-verification’ bugs
    • robbiew to review ServerTeam wiki
      • got status page up, but still reviewing
    • SpamapS to email a concrete proposal for addressing SRU verification backlog
      • done
    • Kernel team to follow up on bug 661294
      • still in progress
    • SpamapS to setup trend line for server team natty work items
      • done
    • JamesPage to arrange URL for Hudson CI Server
      • still in progress
  • Natty Development
    • Alpha1 released
    • robbiew doesn’t have much here for this week
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
    • 684304 is blocking UEC testing
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
    • working on a hard-to-reproduce nfs bug
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
    • not much to say, more next week
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
  • Open Discussion
    • RoAkSoAx working on MIRs for the cluster stack in Natty
    • zul to request feedback on the install-service blueprint to the mailing list
  • Announce next meeting date and time

Meeting Actions

  • ACTION: robbiew to review ServerTeam wiki
  • ACTION: Kernel team to follow up on 661294
  • ACTION: JamesPage to arrange URL for Hudson CI Server
  • ACTION: spamaps to talk to his friend to try and get more info on Bug #684304
  • ACTION: zul to request feedback on the install-service blueprint to the mailing list

Detailed log at:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20101207


Read more
s3hh

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • ALL: please check the SRU tracker https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/SRUTracker and help out with verification
  • robbiew to review /ServerTeam wiki
  • SpamapS to email a concrete proposal for addressing SRU verification backlog

General Discussion

  • There are a great number of unnasigned SRU-nominated bugs. We should try tomake progress on the lucid ones before 10.04.2. SpamapS will devise a concrete proposal for addressing the backlog and email it for comment.
  • hggdh sent out a call for packges running testsuites during build. He got some more packages to build, and they are already on the process.
  • Robbie’s main focus with blueprints is to identify work we know we can’t do. For the most part, looking good. He hopes to have it all sorted by Friday.
  • After almost 10 minutes spent discussing maverick SRUs, it was suggested that while they had been important to discuss immediately after release, they should now be globbed into the big list with lucid ones. Skaet will be sending an email about a bi-weekly meeting to cover SRU’s. Serge will remove them from the server team agenda.
  • hggdh is working with zul to take over part of the SRU process.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, November 23d at 16:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
spamaps

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • mathiaz: to verify SRU bug 666028
  • ALL: please check the SRU tracker for verification-needed bugs and help out with verification
  • SpamapS: change kernel team representative from jjohansen to smb in meeting agenda going forward
  • robbiew: update the fridge calendar with new ubuntu server meeting time
  • hggdh: contact Ubuntu Developers asking for packages which run test suites during build.

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

Because the previous meeting was pre-UDS, there were no ACTION points to review.

Natty Development

Specifications should be submitted for review, robbiew is reviewing/approving those that are ready.

Maverick SRUs

  • JamesPage brought up bug #666028 as it would need verification.

  • This brought up the bigger topic that there are no actual resources available to do verification of SRU’s right now, so we should all allocate some time to watching for SRU’s that are marked verification-needed and verify when possible. These are listed in Chuck’s SRU tracker: http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html#verified_bugs

  • There was talk of a “daily verification” schedule similar to bug triage. Discussion of this further is deferred.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

  • The ISO images page was consolidated, causing some confusion. hggdh thought we were going to have to start doing ISO testing for MAC, armel, PPC, even possibly PS3.
    • robbiew put this to rest, i386/amd64 are the only ones requiring server ISO testing. This was just the result of consolidation.
  • hggdh is expanding daily builds to include any packages that run extensive tests during their build process.
    • All are encouraged to send examples to hggdh. He will contact ubuntu developers for help in finding more.
    • mathiaz noted that rules files could be grepped for the ‘nocheck’ test that is suggested for any large test suites during build.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • jjohansen has transitioned his role as server team kernel delegate to smb
  • smb notes kernel bug #415353 which he will be looking into to help address issues with teh bnx2x drivers.
  • jjohansen noted that there is an SRU pending for bug #651370 which causes ec2 to crash with an invalid opcode in maverick
  • jjohansen noted that pv-on-hvm drivers are in the natty kernel and will undergo testing/experimentation in the short term.

Meeting time and scheduling

  • The meeting is a bit late in the day for many of the european participants, so it was proposed, and accepted, to move the meeting back to 1600 UTC.
    • robbiew will add an entry to the official #ubuntu-meeting calendar on the fridge

Open Discussion

  • RoAkSoaX would like people to review his split for cluster-stack library packages. SpamapS suggests adding a merge proposal and asking ubuntu-server for review.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, November 16th at 16:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
Thierry Carrez

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community: carried over
  • ALL to mark maverick assigned specs as “Implemented” or Deferred: carried over
  • jjohansen to look into virtual kernel bug status (658461): carried over

  • jjohansen to look into t1.micro java lockup bug (634487): in progress

Natty development

  • It’s Syncs and merges season, please cover your bits.
  • UDS sessions relating to server are listed at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ttx/+specs?role=subscriber

  • All blueprints should now be filed.
  • We may consider an extra blueprint about openvswitch, need to define use cases first.
  • For good scheduling, everyone should mark themselves essential to the sessions where they are indeed essential. That is done through Subscribing to the blueprint and marking yourself essential to the discussion.
  • Set yourself as drafter on UDS sessions you want to lead. If you can’t do that, ask ttx to do it for you.

Maverick SRUs

  • Bug 661547 – Existing patch gssapi.diff makes guess_service_principal produce garbage: blocked by other fix in -proposed

  • Bug 657149 – squid fails to upgrade: incomplete

  • Bug 658227 – openldap fails to upgrade: in -proposed

  • Bug 660227 – php5-pgsql crash on getting an error back from postgres: in -proposed

  • Bug 600174 – axis2c fails to build from source on maverick/i386: Daviey will ping doko about it at UDS

  • We need to revive the SRU tracker for Maverick to ease SRU work tracking.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • smoser proposed kernel bug bounties under a beer form.
  • kernel version for natty should be 2.6.37 or .38
  • smoser raised Bug 662842 (remove linux-ec2 from natty): jjohansen said it was on his TODO alraedy

Open Discussion

  • robbiew is now Canonical server team interim manager.
  • ScottK mentioned a discussion on the ML that wasn’t translated into a spec yet: fixing hostname detection/setting. This is a foundations spec, but of great interest for server. Robbie filed it and subscribed Scott to it.

Meeting Actions

  • mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community (carry over)

  • ALL to mark maverick assigned specs as “Implemented” or Deferred (carry over)

  • jjohansen to look into bug 634487 and bug 658461 (carry over)

  • ttx to check if a session is needed around openvswitch

  • ALL to subscribe to BPs where their attendance is required

  • ALL to set themselves as drafter where they want to lead sessions

  • zul to check SRU tracker status

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be Tuesday 2010-11-02 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting (10/26 cancelled for UDS).


Read more
spamaps

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • ACTION: mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community (carry over)

  • ACTION: ALL to mark maverick assigned specs as “Implemented” or Deferred

  • ACTION: jjohansen to look into virtual kernel bug status (658461)

  • ACTION: jjohansen to look into t1.micro java lockup bug (634487)

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • ACTION: mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community
    • mathiaz was unable to attend, action point carried over to next week
  • ACTION: smoser to get skaet info on how to publish EC2 images
    • DONE ec2 images were published along with the rest of 10.10
  • ACTION: Everyone to celebrate the 10.10.10 release in their own unique ways
    • DONE emphatically

Postmortem for Maverick (ttx)

  • Close your specs
    • ACTION: ALL to mark maverick assigned specs as “Implemented” or Deferred

  • SRUs (658227, 600174)

    • Everyone should keep a close eye on high priority bug candidates for SRU to maverick.

Natty development

  • Opening: Syncs and Merges (ttx)
    • Natty will open soon, now is the time to start looking at merges
  • Natty specs preparation (jib)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

  • QA and BugSquad are phasing out the ‘regression-potential’ tag, and it should not be used anymore. regression-release, regression-proposed, or regression-updates should be used to signal even potential regressions.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • Phantom load bug fix in lucid has not landed yet but should soon
  • ACTION: jjohansen to look into virtual kernel bug status (658461)

  • ACTION: jjohansen to look into t1.micro java lockup bug (634487)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

  • sommer was not in attendance

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)

  • Reminder that this is UbuntuOpenWeek

  • kim0 has been talking with some community members and getting them fired up about contributing, with 8 potential contributors. He would appreciate volunteers for mentoring them.

Open Discussion

  • RoAkSoAx has an HA UEC-CLC setup using cluster stack (pacemaker, heartbeat), he would like to discuss this further at UDS during a cluster stack focused session.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday 2010-10-19 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting


Read more
Dustin Kirkland

For more details, see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20101005

== Minutes ==
==== Meeting Actions ====
* ACTION: mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the
puppet community
* ACTION: smoser to get skaet info on how to publish EC2 images
* ACTION:  Everyone to celebrate the 10.10.10 release in their own unique ways

==== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ====
* jiboumans to send an email to ubuntu-server@ and/or blog post for
call for ideas
* DONE (during the course of the meeting)
* mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community
* ACTION (held over to next week)

==== Maverick development (jib) ====
* jib: winding down, ttx in London for release sprint

==== release status, the road to 10.10.10 release (ttx) ====
* ttx: nothing critical, a few FTBFS, nothing queued against the
release, ISO testing to begin soon
* ACTION: smoser to get skaet info on how to publish EC2 images

==== Natty preparation (jib) ====
* jib: [[ServerTeam/NattyIdeaPool]] is open, spend some time next
week brainstorming

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh) ====
* hggdh: we will be dropping regression-potential

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen) ====
* jjohansen: ill, not at meeting

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer) ====
* sommer: not around

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0) ====
* kim0: not around

==== Open Discussion ====
* SRU 649591 (mountall spins eating cpu when ‘nobootwait’ option
exists in fstab followed by a comma)
* kirkland sponsored smoser’s proposal
* ACTION:  Everyone to celebrate the 10.10.10 release in their own unique ways

==== Announce next meeting date and time ====
* Tuesday 2010-10-12 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting

:-D ustin


Read more
jiboumans

With the Maverick release cycle nearing its completion, it’s
time to start looking forward to our next release: Natty
Narwhal.

Following tradition, we’ll kick off the Natty development
cycle with a Ubuntu Developer Summit in the last week of
October. To help us make the most of that week, we’ve started
a wiki page to collect all ideas and feedback regarding
the Ubuntu Server, which we’ll use as input to the individual
sessions at UDS:

There’s a braindump area at the top; anything goes and all
ideas are welcome. If you have anything you’d like to see
changed in Natty, we’d love to hear about it!

If you’ll be attending UDS and already have a topic for a
session you’d like to lead, please suggest it in the ‘UDS
Sessions’ section at the bottom of the page. Be sure to
add your name to it and a link to the matching blueprint
in Launchpad.

I’m very much looking forward to your contributions and
hope to see you in person at UDS.

-Jos


Read more
ssmoser

Meeting Actions

  • [ACTION] SpamapS to chase drizzle in maverick decide between “broken” and “removed” with slight possibility of “beta”
  • [ACTION] jiboumans to send an email to ubuntu-server@ and/or blog post for call for ideas
  • [ACTION] (carryover) mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • SpamapS will continue to follow up on drizzle in maverick.

Maverick development (jib)

RC release status (ttx)

  • Only critical issue at that time was Eucalyptus upgrade

The road to 10.10.10 release (ttx)

  • ISO testing is in progress (subsequently finished with all tests run and on time)
  • Daily triage is particularly important right now. Please take care to find high impact issues.
  • EC2 Images for RC were waiting on 649833

  • Daviey and Mathaiz will cover general RC release issues, with smoser handling UEC images

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

  • hggdh sent a mail to ubuntu-devel proposing a change on the usage of ‘regression-*’ tags. Comments are appreciated.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • user-data corruption bug bug is fixed
  • 574910 is expected to move into SRU this week

  • there will be a 0 day kernel update that the kernel team is queuing fixes for

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

  • no discussion

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)

  • This week, kim0 is collecting feedback from “newcomer” Ubuntu server ocmmunity. The goal being to understand if we’re doing a good job accepting new community members, availing helpful data, things to work on, and guidance along the path.
  • kim0 has recieved pings from a dozen people who would like to contribute
  • cloud portal (http://cloud.ubuntu.com) is expected to be released soon.

  • To see the cloud portal now, add “217.139.24.3 kimos.com” to /etc/hosts and visit kimos.com.

Open Discussion

  • 582963 in apache2 was discussed some, it is being deferred to Natty.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, October 12th at 18:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
Mathias Gug

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • Everyone to update Daily bug triage blueprint when done.

  • ttx to add link to server-mrs tag search from the releasestatus wiki page
  • SpamapS to look at the state of drizzle in maverick – if it build this week ScottK to accept FFe
  • jiboumans to send an email to ubuntu-server@ and/or blog post for call for ideas
  • mathiaz to send out a call for ideas on ubuntu to the puppet community

Maverick development (jib)

Overall: So far so good.

Status for identified RC bugs (ttx)

We don’t have any milestoned bug left, 3 high/critical maverick bugs and 8 Maverick-targeted bugs. List available at:

RC bugs suggestions should be nominated for maverick and ttx should be made aware of them via IRC.

Drizzle state in maverick

Drizzle is currently broken in maverick. It may be possible to fix it for maverick if done this week.

Natty development (jib)

With feature development unwinding and only a handful of bugs targeted to release, this is a great time to put your thinking caps on for Natty if you have some spare time. Like last round, we’ll use the IdeaPool wiki page to gather thoughts.

LP blueprints should filed if someone is ready to lead a session at UDS-N.

If someone has strong connection with other communities a targeted call for ideas could be useful.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

Several team members congratulated ara on the new Ubuntu QA website.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

There aren’t any high priority bugs on the kernel team radar related to server. Others include:

Call for testing lucid kernel:

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

Skipped as sommer wasn’t available.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)

The cloud portal is taking a good shape.

Feedback for growing the ubuntu cloud community suggested to provide technical guides or white-papers on “best practices” on how to write cloud apps, how to deploy services in the cloud, and how to build your own private cloud (storage concerns, network concerns and best practices …etc)

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, September 28th at 18:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
Daviey

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Topic: Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • jjohansen to provide tests for bug 582963 and request SRU
    • Deferred to kernel section of meeting

Topic: Maverick development (jib)

  • See Meeting logs

Topic: Status for RC bugs (ttx)

  • Action: Daviey to contact upstream eucalyptus, regarding issues that seem to be blocked.

Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • Action: jjohansen to follow up on bug 574910 with the current direction
  • Action: jjohansen and smoser to report on bug 613083 bug 606373 and next meeting

Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

  • Action: sommer and mathiaz to sync up regarding puppet server guide

Topic: Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)

  • Deferring until next meeting

Topic: Open Discussion

  • Action: RoAkSoAx to email ubuntu server mailing list with update of cluster stack

Topic: Announce next meeting date and time

Meeting Actions

  • Daviey to contact upstream eucalyptus, regarding issues that seem to be blocked.
  • jjohansen to follow up on bug 574910 with the current direction
  • jjohansen and smoser to report on bug 613083 bug 606373 and next meeting
  • sommer and mathiaz to sync up regarding puppet server guide
  • RoAkSoAx to email ubuntu server mailing list with update of cluster stack progress

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, September 14th at 18:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
s3hh

Here are the meeting minutes. They can also be found
here
with full irc logs.

  • Agenda
    • Review ACTION points from previous meeting
      • SpamapS to submit rubygems change proposal as Important bug in Debian and CC ubuntu-devel
      • jjohansen to review bug 493156
      • zul to review papercut status of bug 582963
      • ttx to make burnup charts available to people who want them
    • Maverick development (jib)
      • Beta milestone release (ttx) – Beta-milestoned bugs and ISO testing
      • Post-beta work – Maverick bugs and release status page (ttx)
    • Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
    • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)
      • pv-ops kernel status update
    • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
    • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Ubuntu Community Team (kim0)
    • Papercuts Maverick retrospective (ttx)
    • Open Discussion
    • Announce next meeting date and time
      • Tuesday 2010-09-07 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting
  • Minutes
  • Meeting Actions
    • jjohansen to provide tests for bug 582963 and request SRU
  • ACTIONS from previous meeting
    • SpamapS to submit rubygems change proposal as Important bug in Debian and CC ubuntu-devel
      • submitted, discussion had, consensus reached…
      • rubygems 1.9.1 to be merged into ruby 1.9, and gems to be placed in /usr/local/bin
      • copious congratulations and kudos from all around to Spamaps
    • jjohansen to review bug 493156 (“Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT”)
      • test kernel built, but not yet submitted for SRU
    • zul to review papercut status of bug 582963
      • Done, in apache now
      • side effect in the form of a new SSl bug
      • zul may revert
    • ttx to make burnup charts available to people who want them
      • http://people.canonical.com/~ttx/current-milestone-progress.svg is refreshed hourly
  • Maverick development (jib)
    • beta cycle is winding down (ends this thursday)
      • we are mostly on track
    • iso testing coming up soon
    • jib and ttx finalizing RC plan on friday
    • ttx described in detail how to prioritize work
      • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/MaverickReleaseStatus
      • Milestoned bugs — those have high priority
      • high priority meaning, spec work is even secondary
      • then you have “High, release targeted bugs”
      • and finally “Other release-targeted bugs” – targets of opportunity
    • ttx points out that week between Beta release and FinalFreeze is time to fix seemingly basic bugs
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
    • QA team changing the way regression tags are used – RFC out soon
    • mathiaz announces that he has automated all of the iso testing
  • Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)
    • Bug #606373 – sporadic console output – looking for a race
    • Bug #620994 (xen kernel BUG) – after extensive testing doesn’t affect, Maverick or Lucid
    • Bug #614853 (kernel panic divide error) – could not replicate
    • Bug 621175 (virtual kernel contains too many modules) – will have to be fixed post-beta
  • Papercuts Maverick retrospective (ttx)
    • 48 targets; 25 bugs fixed; 8 invalidated; 3 waiting on upstream; 12 postponed
    • ttx frets that the effort failed in bringing in new contributors
    • kirkland asks how many users were made happier with Ubuntu Server
      • tough to quantify
    • kirkland and mathiaz agree that it is nice dedicating time to fix small bugs
    • hallyn and Spamaps concur that it was a useful exercise for learning about packaging
    • We will further discuss at UDS-N
  • Agree on next meeting date and time
    • Next meeting will be on Tuesday, September 7th at 18:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeti

Read more
spamaps

GlusterFS is a nice flexible clustered filesystem for Linux servers, and (through several methods) a few different client OS’s. It is included in Debian, and so, we have it available in the Ubuntu universe archive.

With Maverick (soon to be Ubuntu 10.10), we wanted to see how easy it would be to setup a gluster server and client on EC2, using nothing but our nifty cloud-init tool in Maverick. Once we got the mounts working right This proved pretty easy actually, as gluster has a really simple initial setup.

So, first I setup servers. Normally I think you’d want to use EBS for the servers, so that if you accidentally teardown all of your servers, your data is still reachable. But for this test, I simply used the instance store.

I fired up two instances of Maverick first. I used uec-run-instances from the ‘cloud-utils’ package as I like the –wait-for=ssh mode


uec-run-instances -p ec2 -n 2 -t m1.small --wait-for=ssh -l clint-fewbar ami-46f9132

The -l clint-fewbar above actually tells cloud-init to load my SSH keys that are attached to my launchpad account. Pretty neat trick, though it is, unfortunately, incompatible with feeding in more config data (though you can still run the command that will import these anyway).

This started two m1.small maverick instances (note that my environment is setup to run ec2-* already, which is beyond the scope of this document, but basically involves setting the environment variables EC2_CERT and EC2_PRIVATE_KEY). It doesn’t return until the SSH service is reachable. You can also add –verify-ssh, but that can take a while as it must wait for the console data to be updated, which can be a few minutes on ec2 (On eucalyptus, it is instant).

From here, I added the public IP’s to a local file called gluster_servers.txt, and used parallel-ssh to set them up:


PSSH="parallel-ssh -h gluster_servers.txt -l ubuntu -P"
$PSSH -- sudo apt-get install glusterfs-server
$PSSH -- sudo mkdir /mnt/test
$PSSH -- sudo glusterfs-volgen -r 1 -n test internal-ip1:/mnt/test internal-ip2:/mnt/test
$PSSH -- sudo mv -f test-tcp.vol /etc/glusterfs/glusterfs.vol
$PSSH-- sudo mv `hostname -s`-test-export.vol /etc/glusterfs/glusterfsd.vol
$PSSH -- sudo service glusterfs-server restart

Note that all of this could have actually been done by cloud-init too by feeding it a script.

Now to the clients, this was particularly cool. First, I took the example glusterfs file from /usr/share/doc/cloud-init/examples and modified it to substitute the internal hostname of one of my servers for ‘volfile-server-hostname’. Then I started up 3 instances feeding them all this file:


#cloud-config
# vim: syntax=yaml
# Mounts volfile exported by glusterfsd running on
# "volfile-server-hostname" onto the local mount point '/mnt/data'
#
# In reality, replace 'volfile-server-hostname' with one of your nodes
# running glusterfsd.
#
packages:
- glusterfs-client

mounts:
- [ 'internal-ip1:6996', /mnt/data, glusterfs, "defaults,nobootwait", "0", "2" ]

runcmd:
- [ modprobe, fuse ]
- [ mkdir, '-p', /mnt/data ]
- [ mount, '-a' ]

And to start three nodes with the above config data.


uec-run-instances -p ec2 -n 3 -t m1.small --wait-for=ssh --run-args='-k:myEc2KeyPairName:-f:cloud_config.txt' --run-args-delim=: ami-46f9132

As these were booting up, I started to see little messages in the logs…


[2010-08-19 20:41:10] N [server-protocol.c:6788:notify] server-tcp: 10.241.89.129:1023 disconnected
[2010-08-19 20:41:10] N [server-protocol.c:6788:notify] server-tcp: 10.241.89.129:1022 disconnected
[2010-08-19 20:41:10] N [server-protocol.c:5852:mop_setvolume] server-tcp: accepted client from 10.241.89.129:1023
[2010-08-19 20:41:10] N [server-protocol.c:5852:mop_setvolume] server-tcp: accepted client from 10.241.89.129:1021
[2010-08-19 20:41:25] N [server-protocol.c:6788:notify] server-tcp: 10.240.54.143:1023 disconnected
[2010-08-19 20:41:25] N [server-protocol.c:6788:notify] server-tcp: 10.240.54.143:1022 disconnected

Sweeeeet, this is the clients connecting to download the volume definitions.

Once this happened, I ran parallel-ssh with the client boxes to find out if they were mounted properly:


PSSH="parallel-ssh -h client_hosts.txt -l ubuntu -O "IdentityFile=myAmazonKeyFile.pem" -P"
$PSSH df

Lo and behold, they all had /mnt/data hosted and shared!

Coolness, now time to fire up some bonnie++…


$PSSH -t -1 -e stderr -o stdout -- bonnie++ -d /mnt/data/bonnie -f

You may notice that I had to pass ‘-f’. This is the “per-char” write test. This writes one char at a time, and on glusterfs was so slow, after 2 hours I aborted it.

While this was running, I was looking at the underlying exported data directory on the servers, and the files appeared to be staying in perfect sync, which makes sense given that we told gluster to use “raid 1″ redundancy.

And, upon finishing, I got this result:


Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
domU-12-31-39 3328M 6578 2 3881 1 37751 3 81.4 1
Latency 2013ms 667ms 254ms 436ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
domU-12-31-39-04-31 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 37 0 275 0 48 0 35 0 71 0 51 0
Latency 371ms 647ms 842ms 536ms 286ms 264ms
1.96,1.96,domU-12-31-39-04-31-61,1,1282263738,3328M,,,,6578,2,3881,1,,,37751,3,81.4,1,16,,,,,37,0,275,0,48,0,35,0,71,0,51,0,,2013ms,667ms,,254ms,436ms,371ms,647ms,842ms,536ms,286ms,264ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
domU-12-31-39 3328M 6568 2 3333 1 28002 2 116.0 2
Latency 2013ms 1709ms 178ms 437ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
domU-12-31-39-05-5A -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 33 0 170 0 43 0 34 0 133 0 59 0
Latency 481ms 761ms 679ms 306ms 87231us 129ms
1.96,1.96,domU-12-31-39-05-5A-77,1,1282263755,3328M,,,,6568,2,3333,1,,,28002,2,116.0,2,16,,,,,33,0,170,0,43,0,34,0,133,0,59,0,,2013ms,1709ms,,178ms,437ms,481ms,761ms,679ms,306ms,87231us,129ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
domU-12-31-39 3328M 2442 0 2324 1 31734 3 90.4 1
Latency 640ms 287ms 95367us 457ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
domU-12-31-39-04-71 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 45 0 5689 5 93 0 57 0 365 0 82 0
Latency 224ms 64123us 220ms 109ms 61270us 101ms
1.96,1.96,domU-12-31-39-04-71-67,1,1282262298,3328M,,,,2442,0,2324,1,,,31734,3,90.4,1,16,,,,,45,0,5689,5,93,0,57,0,365,0,82,0,,640ms,287ms,,95367us,457ms,224ms,64123us,220ms,109ms,61270us,101ms

Which basically says that over gluster, we were able to write at about 6.5MB/s, and read at about 37MB/s. To compare this to single m1.small I/O:


Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
ip-10-196-243 3328M 36281 10 40132 11 112935 20 328.8 7
Latency 421ms 241ms 273ms 917ms
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
ip-10-196-243-47 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 18069 62 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 22141 74 +++++ +++ +++++ +++
Latency 50194us 28054us 50611us 40347us 20038us 24108us
1.96,1.96,ip-10-196-243-47,1,1282346486,3328M,,,,36281,10,40132,11,,,112935,20,328.8,7,16,,,,,18069,62,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,22141,74,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,,421ms,241ms,,273ms,917ms,50194us,28054us,50611us,40347us,20038us,24108us

I re-ran this test a few times and it seemed to come out more or less the same, though I would guess it might come out differently on certain instances rather than others. Anyway, this shows 36MB/s writes, and 113MB/s reads. Seems like writing is about 6x slower over gluster, which makes sense as it must write over a network of unknown speed (gigabit? 100Mbit? congested?) and it must actually write to two servers, because of the “-r 1″ given to the glusterfs-volgen command, which means “RAID1″ or “replicate”. Latency also was about 1/4 of what it was over glusterfs, which again, is mostly owing to the network latency.

In conclusion, glusterfs is pretty easy to configure on Maverick cloud instances. I’m sure with some more knowledge and goal driven optimization, people will even tune it like crazy.


Read more
spamaps

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • SpamapS to submit rubygems change proposal as Important bug in Debian and CC ubuntu-devel
  • zul to nudge forward upstart script review process
  • jjohansen to review bug 493156
  • zul to review papercut status of bug 582963

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • everyone to pick 1 or 2 papercuts for the beta cycle
    • deferred until later point of order
  • zul to continue clean up the SRU assigne list by prodding people on status: DONE
  • SpamapS to finalize and send ruby gems proposal to ubuntu-devel
    • proposal finalized, action for coming week to submit as bug on debian rubygems package
  • ttx to send email about 10.04.1 release process to server team: DONE

Maverick development (jib)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

  • (hggdh) UEC testing is progressing and build 1231 was pending build on a PPA before testing could commence on it.
  • (hggdh) QA is taking a look at bugs that are tagged regression-* and will be pushing server-team related bugs

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

  • https://launchpad.net/bugs/574910 – high load for lucid on ec2 – is mostly phantom load, plan is to close that bug and open more specific bugs to target the issues that have caused so much piling on.

  • (Omahn) requested review of bug 493156 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iotop/+bug/493156

  • (jjohansen) pv-ops kernel is still buggy, there is a chance the -ec2 kernel will have to be used instead. smoser doesn’t want to see that happen, but acknowledges that it may be necessary.
  • (jjohansen) kernel tema will be making the “pv-on-hvm drivers” available for testing purposes in a PPA

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Community Team (kim0)

  • kim0 was unable to attend, so this topic was skipped

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)

  • (sommer) says things are going smoothly, and he will have time to work on some new content this week
  • (sommer) String Freeze is Sept 9. sommer has discussed dropping the ubuntu-serverguide package and forwarded that discussion to the ubuntu-server mailing list after the meeting.

Papercuts status (jib)

  • Two papercuts were left, and mathiz and zul stepped up to claim/evaluate them

Open Discussion

  • (mathiaz) 10.04.1 ISO testing had all server tests completed.
  • (andreserl) cluster stack is waiting on a MIR for pacemaker to be approved

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday 2010-08-24 at 1800 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting


Read more
Thierry Carrez

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • everyone to pick 1 or 2 papercuts for the beta cycle
  • zul to continue clean up the SRU assigne list by prodding people on status
  • SpamapS to finalize and send ruby gems proposal to ubuntu-devel
  • ttx to send email about 10.04.1 release process to server team

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

All actions were incomplete and were carried over. The rubygems proposal is being finalized, with the hope to fix it in maverick, but more realistically for maverick+1.

Maverick development (jib)

Alpha3 was delivered last week, beta started with this list. This should be vetted by everyone, so that’s the deliverable as far as jib is concerned.

10.04.1 release (ttx)

10.04.1 was just postponed to next Tuesday, so initial plans need to be adjusted. Since ttx and Daviey will be away, jib, mathiaz and smoser should lead that effort. This will be confirmed by an email from ttx. Bug 571057 will make it, thanks to mathiaz last-minute merge and testing.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

hggdh reported new regressions in eucalyptus. A fix is in the works and should land tomorrow. smoser asked about people using uec-provisioning, and Daviey reported using it with success. SpamapS raised an extremely high new bug rate over the last few weeks, but old timers dismissed it as a very normal new bug rate.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

jjohansen reported bug 597387 as now working in all zones. For bug 574910, he has a test kernel building, and should have an update for that tonight.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Community Team (kim0)

kim0 launched the maps effort for 10.04.1: see http://maps.ubuntu.com/

Open Discussion

Daviey raised bug 613463 — the dependency should be reverted, pending a discussion with cjwatson on a potentially better fix. And SpamapS bragged about CEPH being in Maverick now !

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday 2010-08-17 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting


Read more
Mathias Gug

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Meeting Actions

  • SpamapS to send ruby gems proposel to ubuntu-devel
  • zul to clean up the SRU assigne list by prodding people on status
  • everyone to pick 1 or 2 papercuts for the beta cycle

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • SpamapS to work with mathiaz on a proposal, and send proposal to -devel on ruby gems in ubuntu: Work in progress.
  • Daviey & kirkland to review http://doc.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/serverguide/C/uec.html: DONE.

  • entire team to fix your papercuts by end-of-the-week: reviewed later in a meeting topic.
  • SpamapS and ScottK to reivew Kolab php5 patches: patches submitted to upstream and should be available after alpha3.

Maverick development (jib)

  • alpha3 overcommitted, several WI postponed to beta.
  • cloud-utils, daily-vcs, uec-monitoring: won’t be able to be done before FF.
  • added blueprints to track ongoing work like ISO testing and triaging, just to provide more insight, so those will be in the tracker as well starting the beta cycle.
  • most blueprints should be scoped for the beta workloads now, so please have a look and make sure there are no anomalies.

Alpha3-milestoned bugs (ttx)

  • remaining bugs were retargeted to beta
  • UEC: All-in-one topo working, other topologies and loadtesrting are still very broken

Alpha3 ISO testing (ttx)

  • ISO respin tomorrow morning: concentrate your ISO testing efforts on tomorrow’s
  • Cloud images will also be respun.

Remember area of ISO testing, it’s marked down on the corresponding work item.

Magical powers

ttx bragged about the fact that he could take on a triceratops with his bare hands and the power of his look. jiboumans shattered ttx dreams reminding him that science had proved triceratops didn’t actually exist.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)

  • Eucalyptus only works in all-in-one

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Community Team (kim0)

  • working with IS on releasing the maps app for the 10.04.1 release
  • Cloud Portal specs updated and feedback is welcome

Weekly SRU review (zul)

Server papercuts (ttx)

Team member activity and presence: Eurekastreams

  • mathiaz ran into Eureka streams and wondered if that could be used track team member activity automatically. jiboumans, ttx and Spamaps looked at it and found potential.

  • ttx has been missing recently is some presence tool. Eureka streams may not help in that regard. Being able to tell people are “at work”. Crosscheking with calendars doesn’t really help.

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, August 10th at 18:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more
jiboumans

We’ve just started the Alpha3 cycle for Maverick. In broad strokes the plans are unchanged, but there are some notable developments:

  • Several of the Java projects we are adopting are quite fast moving. We are looking into a solution that favours ease of discovery of new releases. If you have any thoughts on the matter, please review the affected blueprints and let us know your thoughts.
  • A few blueprints could really use your help! To get the best possible bug reports, apport hooks are tremendously helpful. If you have a few spare cycles, consider writing one or two!
  • Everybody loves trying new versions of software, especially if they fix an issue you’ve been running into. The daily VCS blueprint is doing exactly that and there’s plenty on the list to pick from, or create one for your own favourite package.

As a reminder, for those doing feature work in Ubuntu, Alpha 3 is the last milestone before Feature Freeze, so make sure you get your changes in before then.

If you’d like to contribute to the Maverick release, please join us at our weekly IRC meetings on Tuesdays between 1800 and 1900 UTC on #ubuntu-meeting on irc.freenode.net.

On behalf of the Ubuntu Server Team,

-Jos


Read more
jiboumans

Review ACTION points from previous meeting
  • jjohansen to send email regarding atop patchset – DONE
  • mathiaz to provide work items for Alpha3 on his specs by Thursday – DONE
  • SpamapS to ask kees whether it’s good to seed – DONE
    • Kees says ok to seed libmemcached and memcached into main
  • jjohansen to appropriately prioritze bug 576066 – CARRY OVER
    • The kernel team is looking for feedback and needs hardware to test on
  • sommer to ping mdke re: refresh issue, through email this time – CARRY OVER
    • Pinged, but no reply. Consider next steps for the following meeting
  • everyone to assign themselves to 2 papercuts – DONE
    • Last item was assigned during the meeting.
Maverick development (jib)
Alpha3 development is tracked at the Work Item tracker.
All specs should be appropriately targeted & work items defined by Wednesday EOB.
If there are any questions, please ping jib and he’ll help resolve them.
Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)
Regarding Bug:597387: Maverick EC2 kernel issue, jjohansen created a new Xen kernel and will be testing it during the week. Once that is stabilized, jjohansen will work on a pv-ops kernel.
The kernel team is still looking for active feedbackon the merit of including the atop kernel patches.
Please chime in if you have feedback to offer!
Weekly SRU review (zul)
Chuck announced the new SRU process on the mailing list last week, which should make it easier to nominate new SRUs and track them:
  1. Bug is fixed in development release.
  2. A weekly email is sent to the Ubuntu Server mailing list on the Monday.
  3. Users will have until Friday to nominate bugs that have been fixed in the development list, by giving a +1 to the bug number and the reason for it.
  4. The nominations will be reviewed and be nominated accordingly based on investigation
This weeks nominations were sent out on MondayPlease nominate those you’d like to see approved by Friday!
You can track the overall process of nominated & approved SRUs in the new SRU Tracker, which is updated nightly.
Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
Sommer reminds us that if you find a bug in the documentation, you should file it against ubuntu-docs
Open Discussion
SpamapS would like to add a topic for next weeks meeting on improving Rubygems in Ubuntu.
Mathias points him at Bug:403407 for the background on the current state.
Agree on next meeting date and time
Next meeting will be on Tuesday 2010-07-20 at 1800 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting
On behalf of the Ubuntu Server Team,
- Jos Boumans

Read more
s3hh

== Agenda ==

Please take responsibility for an item if you are adding it, thus we can turn to you when the item crops up. :)

Chair/Scribe will be: hallyn

Items we will be discussing:

* Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* ttx to coordinate testing for Alpha 2
* smoser to chase IS regarding cjwatson’s access and improving https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UEC/Images/Publishing
* jjohansen to ask kamal to email ubuntu-server mailing list with results of atop patchset
* jjohansen, tim or andy to email ccheney and Daviey with test kernels for bug #588861
* People to subscribe to the test coverage for http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntuserver/all
* hggdh to email interested parties about the results of the ppa euca build
* jjohansen to follow up on bug #TBC – EC2 kernel (lucid/maverick kernel ?)
* zul to mail the ubuntu-server mailing list with the SRU nomination process, and document his process from there
* Maverick development (ttx)
* Alpha2 [[http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-server-maverick-alpha-2.html|subcycle status]]: Specs should at 90-100% completion now (flag remaining work items needing to be postponed)
* Alpha2-milestoned [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+bugs?field.milestone=27560|bugs]]:
* Bug Bug:588410: dynamic block storage should use virtio
* Bug Bug:595421: Eucalyptus doesn’t start with latest stable version of “Groovy”
* Bug Bug:574554: tgtd needs init script or upstart job
* [[http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-server-maverick-alpha-3.html|Alpha3 subcycle]] starts Friday
* Alpha2 [[http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntuserver/all|ISO testing coverage]] (ttx)
* smoser: EC2 images
* kirkland/Daviey/ccheney: Maverick UEC topologies, UEC Maverick images (on Lucid UEC), Netboot tests
* hallyn/mathiaz/SpamapS/zul: non-UEC Ubuntu Server tests, Upgrade server
* ttx/hggdh: random testing, cover holes in testing, replace missing people
* Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
* Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)
* Bug Bug:588861: “pad block corrupted” error with >=2.6.34 kernel
* atop kernel patch
* Maverick EC2 kernel issue (LP: #??)
* Bug Bug:576066: ums-cypress.ko missing from server installer
* Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer)
* Papercuts status (ttx)
* Alpha2 [[https://launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+milestone/maverick-alpha-2|iteration final status]]
* Alpha3 [[https://launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+milestone/maverick-alpha-3|iteration]] starts Friday, assign yourself
* Weekly SRU review: [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#SRU%20weekly%20review]] (zul)
* New [[http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html|SRU Tracker]]
* New SRU process ?
* Open Discussion
* Announce next meeting date and time
* Tuesday 2010-07-06 at 1800 UTC – #ubuntu-meeting

Please feel free to add more items to the agenda for the next meeting. We will discuss them in turn when it arrives.

== Minutes ==

==== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ====

* ttx to coordinate testing for Alpha 2
* done
* smoser to chase IS regarding cjwatson’s access and improving
* done
* jjohansen to ask kamal to email ubuntu-server mailing list with results of atop patchset
* kamal did basic testing
* jjohansen emailed jos, and ttx, and sent an email to k-t for discussion
* [ACTION] jjohansen to send email regarding atop patchset
* jjohansen, tim or andy to email ccheney and Daviey with test kernels for bug #588861
* this was DONE and fixed.
* Daviey notes that the kernel team and ccheney rock
* hggdh to email interested parties about the results of the ppa euca build
* tests still being run on latest & greatest version of the patch. So far, so good
* right now, ~400 instances, no issue
* jjohansen to follow up on bug #TBC – EC2 kernel (lucid/maverick kernel ?)
* Launchpad bug 597387 in Ubuntu “pv-ops kernel only works in 3 or 4 zones in EC2″ [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597387
* zul to mail the ubuntu-server mailing list with the SRU nomination process, and document his process from there
* done

==== Maverick development (ttx) ====
* http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-server-maverick-alpha-2.html
* Specs should be at 90-100% now
* Alpha2-milestoned bugs
* Launchpad bug 588410 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) “dynamic block storage should use virtio” [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588410
* Launchpad bug 595421 in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Maverick) “Eucalyptus doesn’t start with latest stable version of “Groovy”" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/595421
* Launchpad bug 574554 in tgt (Ubuntu Maverick) “tgtd needs init script or upstart job” [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/574554
* Alpha3 subcycle starts Friday
* http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/maverick/canonical-server-maverick-alpha-3.html
* [ACTION] mathiaz to provide work items for Alpha3 on his specs by Thursday
* Launchpad bug 586638 in libmemcached (Ubuntu) “[MIR] libmemcached” [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/586638
* SpamapS to ask kees whether it’s good to seed

==== Alpha2 ISO testing coverage (ttx) ====
* alpha2 milestone candidates should hit us RSN
* smoser will cover the EC2 images
* kirkland/Daviey/ccheney: Maverick UEC topologies, UEC Maverick images (on Lucid UEC), Netboot tests
* hallyn/mathiaz/SpamapS/zul: non-UEC Ubuntu Server tests, Upgrade server
* ttx/hggdh: random testing, cover holes in testing, replace missing people
* ttx will replace mathiaz

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen) ====
* Launchpad bug 588861 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) “”pad block corrupted” error when trying to register an image with 2.6.34 kernel” [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588861
* atop kernel patch
* will send email to server list
* Maverick EC2 kernel issue
* at this point we’ll have Lucidish kernels in A2
* we will have a kernel for A3
* Launchpad bug 576066 in linux (Ubuntu) “ums_cypress missing from lucid server cd” [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/576066
* jjohansen will prioritize appropriately

==== Weekly Updates & Questions for the Documentation Team (sommer) ====
* ttx: sommer: did you fix the refresh issue ?
* [ACTION] sommer to ping mdke again, through email this time

==== Papercuts status (ttx) ====
* 14 targets – 10 fixed, 2 postponed, 2 invalidated
* ttx processed the numerous nominations for A3 and decided to choose 18 among the 18 valid ones
* https://launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+milestone/maverick-alpha-3
* You should each have ~2 bugs assigned to you in that list
* [ACTION] everyone to assign themselves to 2 papercuts from https://launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+milestone/maverick-alpha-3

==== Weekly SRU review: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#SRU%20weekly%20review (zul) ====
* http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server-team/fixedbugs.ubuntu-server.latest.html
* Launchpad bug 576949 in mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) “[lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43″ [Medium,In progress]
* zul+ttx agree it is a candidate
* Launchpad bug 597818 in dovecot (Ubuntu) “Include files parsed in reverse order” [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597818
* zul says looks good to him
* Launchpad bug 589056 in net-snmp (Ubuntu) “snmpd fails to upgrade” [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/589056
* ttx will nominate for lucid

==== Agree on next meeting date and time ====

Next meeting will be on Tuesday, July 6th at 15:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.


Read more