Canonical Voices

Posts tagged with 'survey'

Dustin Kirkland

  • To date, we've shaved the Bionic (18.04 LTS) minimal images down by over 53%, since Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and trimmed nearly 100 packages and thousands of files.
  • Feedback welcome here:
In last year's AskHN HackerNews post, "Ask HN: What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?", and the subsequent treatment of the data, we noticed a recurring request for "lighter, smaller, more minimal" Ubuntu images.

This is particularly useful for container images (Docker, LXD, Kubernetes, etc.), embedded device environments, and anywhere a developer wants to bootstrap an Ubuntu system from the smallest possible starting point.  Smaller images generally:
  • are subject to fewer security vulnerabilities and subsequent updates
  • reduce overall network bandwidth consumption
  • and require less on disk storage
First, a definition...
"The Ubuntu Minimal Image is the smallest base upon which a user can apt install any package in the Ubuntu archive."
By design, Ubuntu Minimal Images specifically lack the creature comforts, user interfaces and user design experience that have come to define the Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Cloud images.

To date, we've shaved the Bionic (18.04 LTS) minimal images down by over 53%, since Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and trimmed nearly 100 packages and thousands of files.



Read more
Dustin Kirkland

Back in March, we asked the HackerNews community, “What do you want to see in Ubuntu 17.10?”:

A passionate discussion ensued, the results of which are distilled into this post:

In fact, you can check that link, and see our progress so far this cycle.  We already have a beta code in 17.10 available for your testing for several of those:

And several others have excellent work in progress, and will be complete by 17.10:

In summary -- your feedback matters!  There are hundreds of engineers and designers working for *you* to continue making Ubuntu amazing!

Along with the switch from Unity to GNOME, we’re also reviewing some of the desktop applications we package and ship in Ubuntu.  We’re looking to crowdsource input on your favorite Linux applications across a broad set of classic desktop functionality.

We invite you to contribute by listing the applications you find most useful in Linux in order of preference. To help us parse your input, please copy and paste the following bullets with your preferred apps in Linux desktop environments.  You’re welcome to suggest multiple apps, please just order them prioritized (e.g. Web Browser: Firefox, Chrome, Chromium).  If some of your functionality has moved entirely to the web, please note that too (e.g. Email Client: Gmail web, Office Suite: Office360 web).  If the software isn’t free/open source, please note that (e.g. Music Player: Spotify client non-free).  If I’ve missed a category, please add it in the same format.  If your favorites aren’t packaged for Ubuntu yet, please let us know, as we’re creating hundreds of new snap packages for Ubuntu desktop applications, and we’re keen to learn what key snaps we’re missing.

  • Web Browser: ???
  • Email Client: ???
  • Terminal: ???
  • IDE: ???
  • File manager: ???
  • Basic Text Editor: ???
  • IRC/Messaging Client: ???
  • PDF Reader: ???
  • Office Suite: ???
  • Calendar: ???
  • Video Player: ???
  • Music Player: ???
  • Photo Viewer: ???
  • Screen recording: ???

In the interest of opening this survey as widely as possible, we’ve cross-posted this thread to HackerNews, Reddit, and Slashdot.  We very much look forward to another friendly, energetic, collaborative discussion.

Or, you can fill out the survey here:

Thank you!
On behalf of @Canonical and @Ubuntu

Read more
Daniel Holbach

Some weeks ago, I asked for feedback in a survey about Ubuntu development. Particularly, how well we reach out and how Ubuntu development is generally perceived were focus points of the survey. The great thing is: we had ~350 people replying and we have lots of great feedback and ideas in the results.

You can download the summary (including all the answers) here.

Let’s use all the feedback to make Ubuntu development even easier.

Thanks everyone for your replies!

Read more

The Ubuntu App Developer SurveyMaking Ubuntu a Choice for App Developers

We want to put Ubuntu on the app development map. We want to provide a top level experience through a platform that makes it easy for developers to create applications and distribute them to millions.

The Ubuntu Software Centre provided a solid foundation and a springboard to the proliferation of an ecosystem of resources and projects aligned to deliver this vision. Matthew Paul Thomas and Evan Dandrea already layed out the path at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Orlando in 2010, and we’re seeing more and more news related to the work we’re doing while making this happen:

Having gone through the process of distributing our game on the SC, I must say that Canonical has created a fantastic digital distribution toolset. BEEP was pushed through their web-based deployment toolset with no fuss at all. Deploying paid software in Ubuntu is now a no-brainer.

Next is, a place to present developers a clear journey that will guide them through the process of creating and publishing applications for Ubuntu. Along the way, they will find all the resources that will enable them to make the right design decisions and direct them to the information they need in a consistent manner. The site will also be the starting poing for building an app developer community.

You Can Help: Participate in The Ubuntu App Developer Survey

We’re at a point in the design of where we’d like to have some feedback to help us make and validate some of the decisions to provide the best user experience for developers. For this, we’ve prepared a short survey to get some input in the key areas we’re interested in.

So if you are intending to develop apps in the future, here’s your chance to contribute to making Ubuntu thrive in the world of apps: we’d really value your feedback by taking part in the Ubuntu App Developer Survey.

Take The Ubuntu App Developer Survey!We would appreciate if you could complete the survey by Friday, 19th August 2011. Remember that this survey is not only aimed at existing or new Ubuntu developers, but also at people coming from other platforms, so it would be really helpful if you could share this link with anyone you know who might be developing in those other platforms.

Also feel free to get in touch if you’ve got any questions. Thanks!

Read more

Some weeks ago I ran the Ubuntu Translation teams healthcheck survey. The main goal was getting in touch with the teams to have some feedback on how they were doing, if they needed help in any particular area and make sure that they were aware of the latest changes in translation policies. While the results were available on the wiki, I hadn’t had a chance to post a summary.

Here it is.

Language info

Participation. Up to 71 teams participated in the survey. Of these, 58 submitted the input and explicitly agreed to have it published online. This summary represents the input from the following teams:

Persian, Welsh, Manx, Armenian, Punjabi, Bulgarian, Telugu, Portuguese, Dhivehi, Asturian, Belarusian, Hebrew, Icelandic, Macedonian, German, Irish, Kazakh, Norwegian, Afar, Gujarati, Spanish, Hungarian, Sinhala, Arabic, Northern Sotho, Japanese, Finnish, Maori, Greek, Shuswap, Frisian, Tamil, Korean, Estonian, Lojban, Lithuanian, Silesian, Occitan, Ukrainian, Simplified Chinese, Tibetan, Low German, Brazilian, Russian, Dutch, Catalan, French, Khmer, Luxembourgish, Galician, Traditional Chinese (Taiwan), Basque, Slovenian, Uyghur, Swedish, Danish, Italian, Romanian

Active translators. On the question of how many active translators a team has, the average is about 12 Launchpad team members or regular translators, with another average of 20 occasional or drive-by translators.

This seems to validate the model of having a small team of reviewers who can submit and review translations and a bigger group of translators submitting translation suggestions, as well as also confirm the migration in the last cycles to smaller, more manageable moderated teams, focusing on translation quality assurance.

Natural language usability. On the three categories, we seem to be in good shape.

Language Usability

While we’re doing excellent-good in fonts and input method, the interesting bit will be to focus on converting that good-average to excellent-good in applications. One thing to have into account when evaluating fonts and input method though, is that many languages do not need an input method or are nowadays not in need of a set of fonts to correctly display text. So here the challenge will be to concentrate on the languages rated as average and poor to see the areas in which this rating can be improved.

This information is also very useful to me in a per-language basis to see the perception of how usable Ubuntu in a particular language is comparing it to translation coverage statistics.

Translation team policies

Translation policies. While in more than half of the responses translation team coordinators were aware of the new Ubuntu Translations policies, there are still quite some teams who did not know about them. I’ll take an action to send a reminder explaining the new policies.

Ubuntu translators mailing list subscription. We’re now asking all translation team coordinators to be subscribed to the Ubuntu translators mailing list, and it seems that the majority are. Some of the people who said they were not subscribed did it just after participating in the survey. I’ll follow this up with the rest who aren’t on the list, but the most important part is to make sure new team coordinators are aware of the need to be subscribed to follow all Ubuntu translations announcements and forward them to their teams when necessary.

Team membership. The vast majority of teams have now a moderated team membership, which allows them to have more oversight on translation quality. There are still a handful of open teams, which I’ll be trying to help migrating to a moderate membership.

Launchpad team page information. Nearly all teams represented in the survey had up to date information on their Launchpad page, which should be the entry point for translators wanting to translate Ubuntu in their language. Having clear and useful information there is a step that should not take more than a few minutes, but it is extremely important to make the process of joining translation teams easier and thus to get more help in the effort of translating Ubuntu in your own language.

Communication channel.

Translation Team Communication Channels

Mailing lists, be it on, on or externally, are the main communication method for translation coordination. We generally recommend using lists at, as Launchpad mailing lists only allow subscription for team members, which for translation teams exclude occasional, non-member, translators.

The important point for me here is that nowadays nearly all translation teams use some form of communication for successful translation coordination.

From the additional comments, other methods were direct e-mail, face to face meetings, instant messaging, regular IRC meetings and wikis.?

Translation guidelines. While many teams do have guidelines, there is still a 30% of them who haven’t, so I see this as an area that needs improvement. I believe translation guidelines are one of the most basic tools for a successful translation process, and each team, be it new or already established, should have some. Guidelines can cointain glossaries on how to translate common software-related terms, grammar rules or conventions specific to the language and translation of free software – or anything that can help in achieving consistency, resolving doubts and making the translation process more effective. IRC meetings, jams or any other events are generally useful to start developing guidelines.

Our wiki page on guidelines contains some very useful information and good examples from teams using them.

Translation team workflow

Translation bug tracking. The majority of teams use their mailing lists or forums to track translation problems and fix them, but there is still a considerable amount using Launchpad to track translation bugs, and to a lesser extent, external bug trackers.

The point risen here was that the important part was getting actual feedback from users about the problems, and some teams are struggling with this.

Accepting new team members. As a result of most teams being now moderated, the common practice in accepting team members is them asking to join the team, team members reviewing the application and then accepting them.

The thoroughness of the process varies across teams. Some have requirements on new members to have signed the CoC, having a minimum of karma, submitting the application to vote, or some others have a more relaxed process.

Another practice that some teams tend to follow is to have the main team acting as a small set of reviewers who can accept suggestions and a separate, bigger team that anyone can join. This way occasional or new translators can still submit suggestions as usual, but can also have a feeling of being part of the team.

Translation events. That’s another area for development, as the majority of teams don’t seem to be running any translation events. Translation events, either on IRC, or face to face (e.g. a translation jam) are extremely useful for focusing on particular translation goals and getting together to achieving them. Being all together at the same place makes the process much more agile, as reviews can happen instantly, and doubts can also be discussed straight away. We will need to better raise awareness on translation jams, either occasional ones or during the Ubuntu Global Jam.

Translation review process.

Translation Review Process

Here most of the teams seem to use the Launchpad Translations online interface and take advantage of the more agile translation and review process, either just translating and simply fixing errors when they are found, or through an explicit review process after finishing each translation.

Upstream coordination. That was for me one of the most interesting areas of the survey, and I’m quite pleased to see the results.

Upstream Coordination

They show that nowadays most of the Ubuntu translation teams actively coordinate with upstream projects. Using a mixture seems to be the most popular choice: indistinctively translating upstream or in Launchpad. The next most popular approach is translating first upstream and then completing Ubuntu-specific translations in Launchpad.

There are still a few teams who are not working with upstream, and we’ll have to see what the best approach for them to contribute back is. Another interesting trend are those teams translating everything in Launchpad first and then sending it upstream. They tend to be the same translators both upstream teams and in Ubuntu, and they effectively use the best of both worlds: the best online translation interface for open source software combined with sending translations upstream to make them available to all other projects.

Final thoughts

It would have been interesting to compare results with previous data from a couple of cycles ago, but having been part of it for a long time now, my feeling is that the Ubuntu Translations community is developing in the right direction, and I hope that this survey also serves as a testimonial to show external translation communities how Ubuntu translators work. The points about the importance of a defined workflow, team communication, quality assurance and upstream coordination are most definitely getting across.

Some areas in which we’ll have to concentrate is seeing how we can help those teams that are or have become inactive, better communicate the Ubuntu translation policies and work with the teams who don’t have translation guidelines to start developing some. I will also go back to the teams who explicitly asked for help in particular areas.

This has also offered me an invaluable insight on each team and their current situation and workflow, which will help me working with them in the future.

Thanks to everyone who took the time to complete it, as the input has been very valuable to know more about the Ubuntu translations community.? You allow millions of users to use Ubuntu in their own language every day, and you truly rock.

Read more
Gerry Carr

The Ubuntu Server Team wants to know how you use Ubuntu Server Edition in day-to-day operations to help the team prioritize the support and development of the product.  This is the second edition of this initiative which was first introduced in 2008.

In an effort to better understand, support and further the Ubuntu Server Edition we would like to ask you to take this survey which should take between 15 to 30 minutes to complete. The information provided will help us determine where we can improve support, where to add additional resources and to generate a better understanding of the community which we work within.

Please note that this survey is being conducted by the Ubuntu Server Team community together with the Canonical Product Management. Information about the team is available at

To take the survey, please go to


Nick Barcet, Ubuntu Server Edition product manager

Read more