Canonical Voices

Posts tagged with 'lxc'

Christian Brauner

 

containers

For a long time LXD has supported multiple storage drivers. Users could choose between zfs, btrfs, lvm, or plain directory storage pools but they could only ever use a single storage pool. A frequent feature request was to support not just a single storage pool but multiple storage pools. This way users would for example be able to maintain a zfs storage pool backed by an SSD to be used by very I/O intensive containers and another simple directory based storage pool for other containers. Luckily, this is now possible since LXD gained its own storage management API a few versions back.

Creating storage pools

A new LXD installation comes without any storage pool defined. If you run lxd init LXD will offer to create a storage pool for you. The storage pool created by lxd init will be the default storage pool on which containers are created.

asciicast

Creating further storage pools

Our client tool makes it really simple to create additional storage pools. In order to create and administer new storage pools you can use the lxc storage command. So if you wanted to create an additional btrfs storage pool on a block device /dev/sdb you would simply use lxc storage create my-btrfs btrfs source=/dev/sdb. But let’s take a look:

asciicast

Creating containers on the default storage pool

If you started from a fresh install of LXD and created a storage pool via lxd init LXD will use this pool as the default storage pool. That means if you’re doing a lxc launch images:ubuntu/xenial xen1 LXD will create a storage volume for the container’s root filesystem on this storage pool. In our examples we’ve been using my-first-zfs-pool as our default storage pool:

asciicast

Creating containers on a specific storage pool

But you can also tell lxc launch and lxc init to create a container on a specific storage pool by simply passing the -s argument. For example, if you wanted to create a new container on the my-btrfs storage pool you would do lxc launch images:ubuntu/xenial xen-on-my-btrfs -s my-btrfs:

asciicast

Creating custom storage volumes

If you need additional space for one of your containers to for example store additional data the new storage API will let you create storage volumes that can be attached to a container. This is as simple as doing lxc storage volume create my-btrfs my-custom-volume:

asciicast

Attaching custom storage volumes to containers

Of course this feature is only helpful because the storage API let’s you attach those storage volume to containers. To attach a storage volume to a container you can use lxc storage volume attach my-btrfs my-custom-volume xen1 data /opt/my/data:

asciicast

Sharing custom storage volumes between containers

By default LXD will make an attached storage volume writable by the container it is attached to. This means it will change the ownership of the storage volume to the container’s id mapping. But Storage volumes can also be attached to multiple containers at the same time. This is great for sharing data among multiple containers. However, this comes with a few restrictions. In order for a storage volume to be attached to multiple containers they must all share the same id mapping. Let’s create an additional container xen-isolated that has an isolated id mapping. This means its id mapping will be unique in this LXD instance such that no other container does have the same id mapping. Attaching the same storage volume my-custom-volume to this container will now fail:

asciicast

But let’s make xen-isolated have the same mapping as xen1 and let’s also rename it to xen2 to reflect that change. Now we can attach my-custom-volume to both xen1 and xen2 without a problem:

asciicast

Summary

The storage API is a very powerful addition to LXD. It provides a set of essential features that are helpful in dealing with a variety of problems when using containers at scale. This short introducion hopefully gave you an impression on what you can do with it. There will be more to come in the future.


Read more
Stéphane Graber

LXD logo

Introduction

As you may know, LXD uses unprivileged containers by default.
The difference between an unprivileged container and a privileged one is whether the root user in the container is the “real” root user (uid 0 at the kernel level).

The way unprivileged containers are created is by taking a set of normal UIDs and GIDs from the host, usually at least 65536 of each (to be POSIX compliant) and mapping those into the container.

The most common example and what most LXD users will end up with by default is a map of 65536 UIDs and GIDs, with a host base id of 100000. This means that root in the container (uid 0) will be mapped to the host uid 100000 and uid 65535 in the container will be mapped to uid 165535 on the host. UID/GID 65536 and higher in the container aren’t mapped and will return an error if you attempt to use them.

From a security point of view, that means that anything which is not owned by the users and groups mapped into the container will be inaccessible. Any such resource will show up as being owned by uid/gid “-1” (rendered as 65534 or nobody/nogroup in userspace). It also means that should there be a way to escape the container, even root in the container would find itself with just as much privileges on the host as a nobody user.

LXD does offer a number of options related to unprivileged configuration:

  • Increasing the size of the default uid/gid map
  • Setting up per-container maps
  • Punching holes into the map to expose host users and groups

Increasing the size of the default map

As mentioned above, in most cases, LXD will have a default map that’s made of 65536 uids/gids.

In most cases you won’t have to change that. There are however a few cases where you may have to:

  • You need access to uid/gid higher than 65535.
    This is most common when using network authentication inside of your containers.
  • You want to use per-container maps.
    In which case you’ll need 65536 available uid/gid per container.
  • You want to punch some holes in your container’s map and need access to host uids/gids.

The default map is usually controlled by the “shadow” set of utilities and files. On systems where that’s the case, the “/etc/subuid” and “/etc/subgid” files are used to configure those maps.

On systems that do not have a recent enough version of the “shadow” package. LXD will assume that it doesn’t have to share uid/gid ranges with anything else and will therefore assume control of a billion uids and gids, starting at the host uid/gid 100000.

But the common case, is a system with a recent version of shadow.
An example of what the configuration may look like is:

stgraber@castiana:~$ cat /etc/subuid
lxd:100000:65536
root:100000:65536

stgraber@castiana:~$ cat /etc/subgid
lxd:100000:65536
root:100000:65536

The maps for “lxd” and “root” should always be kept in sync. LXD itself is restricted by the “root” allocation. The “lxd” entry is used to track what needs to be removed if LXD is uninstalled.

Now if you want to increase the size of the map available to LXD. Simply edit both of the files and bump the last value from 65536 to whatever size you need. I tend to bump it to a billion just so I don’t ever have to think about it again:

stgraber@castiana:~$ cat /etc/subuid
lxd:100000:1000000000
root:100000:1000000000

stgraber@castiana:~$ cat /etc/subgid
lxd:100000:1000000000
root:100000:100000000

After altering those files, you need to restart LXD to have it detect the new map:

root@vorash:~# systemctl restart lxd
root@vorash:~# cat /var/log/lxd/lxd.log
lvl=info msg="LXD 2.14 is starting in normal mode" path=/var/lib/lxd t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=warn msg="CGroup memory swap accounting is disabled, swap limits will be ignored." t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Kernel uid/gid map:" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - u 0 0 4294967295" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - g 0 0 4294967295" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Configured LXD uid/gid map:" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - u 0 1000000 1000000000" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - g 0 1000000 1000000000" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Connecting to a remote simplestreams server" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Expiring log files" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Done expiring log files" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Starting /dev/lxd handler" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="LXD is socket activated" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="REST API daemon:" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - binding Unix socket" socket=/var/lib/lxd/unix.socket t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg=" - binding TCP socket" socket=[::]:8443 t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Pruning expired images" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Updating images" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Done pruning expired images" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
lvl=info msg="Done updating images" t=2017-06-14T21:21:13+0000
root@vorash:~#

As you can see, the configured map is logged at LXD startup and can be used to confirm that the reconfiguration worked as expected.

You’ll then need to restart your containers to have them start using your newly expanded map.

Per container maps

Provided that you have a sufficient amount of uid/gid allocated to LXD, you can configure your containers to use their own, non-overlapping allocation of uids and gids.

This can be useful for two reasons:

  1. You are running software which alters kernel resource ulimits.
    Those user-specific limits are tied to a kernel uid and will cross container boundaries leading to hard to debug issues where one container can perform an action but all others are then unable to do the same.
  2. You want to know that should there be a way for someone in one of your containers to somehow get access to the host that they still won’t be able to access or interact with any of the other containers.

The main downsides to using this feature are:

  • It’s somewhat wasteful with using 65536 uids and gids per container.
    That being said, you’d still be able to run over 60000 isolated containers before running out of system uids and gids.
  • It’s effectively impossible to share storage between two isolated containers as everything written by one will be seen as -1 by the other. There is ongoing work around virtual filesystems in the kernel that will eventually let us get rid of that limitation.

To have a container use its own distinct map, simply run:

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config set test security.idmap.isolated true
stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc restart test
stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config get test volatile.last_state.idmap
[{"Isuid":true,"Isgid":false,"Hostid":165536,"Nsid":0,"Maprange":65536},{"Isuid":false,"Isgid":true,"Hostid":165536,"Nsid":0,"Maprange":65536}]

The restart step is needed to have LXD remap the entire filesystem of the container to its new map.
Note that this step will take a varying amount of time depending on the number of files in the container and the speed of your storage.

As can be seen above, after restart, the container is shown to have its own map of 65536 uids/gids.

If you want LXD to allocate more than the default 65536 uids/gids to an isolated container, you can bump the size of the allocation with:

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config set test security.idmap.size 200000
stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc restart test
stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config get test volatile.last_state.idmap
[{"Isuid":true,"Isgid":false,"Hostid":165536,"Nsid":0,"Maprange":200000},{"Isuid":false,"Isgid":true,"Hostid":165536,"Nsid":0,"Maprange":200000}]

If you’re trying to allocate more uids/gids than are left in LXD’s allocation, LXD will let you know:

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config set test security.idmap.size 2000000000
error: Not enough uid/gid available for the container.

Direct user/group mapping

The fact that all uids/gids in an unprivileged container are mapped to a normally unused range on the host means that sharing of data between host and container is effectively impossible.

Now, what if you want to share your user’s home directory with a container?

The obvious answer to that is to define a new “disk” entry in LXD which passes your home directory to the container:

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc config device add test home disk source=/home/stgraber path=/home/ubuntu
Device home added to test

So that was pretty easy, but did it work?

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc exec test -- bash
root@test:~# ls -lh /home/
total 529K
drwx--x--x 45 nobody nogroup 84 Jun 14 20:06 ubuntu

No. The mount is clearly there, but it’s completely inaccessible to the container.
To fix that, we need to take a few extra steps:

  • Allow LXD’s use of our user uid and gid
  • Restart LXD to have it load the new map
  • Set a custom map for our container
  • Restart the container to have the new map apply
stgraber@castiana:~$ printf "lxd:$(id -u):1\nroot:$(id -u):1\n" | sudo tee -a /etc/subuid
lxd:201105:1
root:201105:1

stgraber@castiana:~$ printf "lxd:$(id -g):1\nroot:$(id -g):1\n" | sudo tee -a /etc/subgid
lxd:200512:1
root:200512:1

stgraber@castiana:~$ sudo systemctl restart lxd

stgraber@castiana:~$ printf "uid $(id -u) 1000\ngid $(id -g) 1000" | lxc config set test raw.idmap -

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc restart test

At which point, things should be working in the container:

stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc exec test -- su ubuntu -l
ubuntu@test:~$ ls -lh
total 119K
drwxr-xr-x 5  ubuntu ubuntu 8 Feb 18 2016 data
drwxr-x--- 4  ubuntu ubuntu 6 Jun 13 17:05 Desktop
drwxr-xr-x 3  ubuntu ubuntu 28 Jun 13 20:09 Downloads
drwx------ 84 ubuntu ubuntu 84 Sep 14 2016 Maildir
drwxr-xr-x 4  ubuntu ubuntu 4 May 20 15:38 snap
ubuntu@test:~$ 

Conclusion

User namespaces, the kernel feature that makes those uid/gid mappings possible is a very powerful tool which finally made containers on Linux safe by design. It is however not the easiest thing to wrap your head around and all of that uid/gid map math can quickly become a major issue.

In LXD we’ve tried to expose just enough of those underlying features to be useful to our users while doing the actual mapping math internally. This makes things like the direct user/group mapping above significantly easier than it otherwise would be.

Going forward, we’re very interested in some of the work around uid/gid remapping at the filesystem level, this would let us decouple the on-disk user/group map from that used for processes, making it possible to share data between differently mapped containers and alter the various maps without needing to also remap the entire filesystem.

Extra information

The main LXD website is at: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd
Development happens on Github at: https://github.com/lxc/lxd
Discussion forun: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org
Mailing-list support happens on: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org
IRC support happens in: #lxcontainers on irc.freenode.net
Try LXD online: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/try-it

Read more
Christian Brauner

lxc exec vs ssh

Recently, I’ve implemented several improvements for lxc exec. In case you didn’t know, lxc exec is LXD‘s client tool that uses the LXD client api to talk to the LXD daemon and execute any program the user might want. Here is a small example of what you can do with it:

asciicast

One of our main goals is to make lxc exec feel as similar to ssh as possible since this is the standard of running commands interactively or non-interactively remotely. Making lxc exec behave nicely was tricky.

1. Handling background tasks

A long-standing problem was certainly how to correctly handle background tasks. Here’s an asciinema illustration of the problem with a pre LXD 2.7 instance:

asciicast

What you can see there is that putting a task in the background will lead to lxc exec not being able to exit. A lot of sequences of commands can trigger this problem:

chb@conventiont|~
> lxc exec zest1 bash
root@zest1:~# yes &
y
y
y
.
.
.

Nothing would save you now. yes will simply write to stdout till the end of time as quickly as it can…
The root of the problem lies with stdout being kept open which is necessary to ensure that any data written by the process the user has started is actually read and sent back over the websocket connection we established.
As you can imagine this becomes a major annoyance when you e.g. run a shell session in which you want to run a process in the background and then quickly want to exit. Sorry, you are out of luck. Well, you were.
The first, and naive approach is obviously to simply close stdout as soon as you detect that the foreground program (e.g. the shell) has exited. Not quite as good as an idea as one might think… The problem becomes obvious when you then run quickly executing programs like:

lxc exec -- ls -al /usr/lib

where the lxc exec process (and the associated forkexec process (Don’t worry about it now. Just remember that Go + setns() are not on speaking terms…)) exits before all buffered data in stdout was read. In this case you will cause truncated output and no one wants that. After a few approaches to the problem that involved, disabling pty buffering (Wasn’t pretty I tell you that and also didn’t work predictably.) and other weird ideas I managed to solve this by employing a few poll() “tricks” (In some sense of the word “trick”.). Now you can finally run background tasks and cleanly exit. To wit:
asciicast

2. Reporting exit codes caused by signals

ssh is a wonderful tool. One thing however, I never really liked was the fact that when the command that was run by ssh received a signal ssh would always report -1 aka exit code 255. This is annoying when you’d like to have information about what signal caused the program to terminate. This is why I recently implemented the standard shell convention of reporting any signal-caused exits using the standard convention 128 + n where n is defined as the signal number that caused the executing program to exit. For example, on SIGKILL you would see 128 + SIGKILL = 137 (Calculating the exit codes for other deadly signals is left as an exercise to the reader.). So you can do:

chb@conventiont|~
> lxc exec zest1 sleep 100

Now, send SIGKILL to the executing program (Not to lxc exec itself, as SIGKILL is not forwardable.):

kill -KILL $(pidof sleep 100)

and finally retrieve the exit code for your program:

chb@conventiont|~
> echo $?
137

Voila. This obviously only works nicely when a) the exit code doesn’t breach the 8-bit wall-of-computing and b) when the executing program doesn’t use 137 to indicate success (Which would be… interesting(?).). Both arguments don’t seem too convincing to me. The former because most deadly signals should not breach the range. The latter because (i) that’s the users problem, (ii) these exit codes are actually reserved (I think.), (iii) you’d have the same problem running the program locally or otherwise.
The main advantage I see in this is the ability to report back fine-grained exit statuses for executing programs. Note, by no means can we report back all instances where the executing program was killed by a signal, e.g. when your program handles SIGTERM and exits cleanly there’s no easy way for LXD to detect this and report back that this program was killed by signal. You will simply receive success aka exit code 0.

3. Forwarding signals

This is probably the least interesting (or maybe it isn’t, no idea) but I found it quite useful. As you saw in the SIGKILL case before, I was explicit in pointing out that one must send SIGKILL to the executing program not to the lxc exec command itself. This is due to the fact that SIGKILL cannot be handled in a program. The only thing the program can do is die… like right now… this instance… sofort… (You get the idea…). But a lot of other signals SIGTERM, SIGHUP, and of course SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 can be handled. So when you send signals that can be handled to lxc exec instead of the executing program, newer versions of LXD will forward the signal to the executing process. This is pretty convenient in scripts and so on.

In any case, I hope you found this little lxc exec post/rant useful. Enjoy LXD it’s a crazy beautiful beast to play with. Give it a try online https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/try-it/ and for all you developers out there: Checkout https://github.com/lxc/lxd and send us patches. </p>
            <a href=Read more

Dustin Kirkland


A couple of weeks ago, I delivered a talk at the Container Camp UK 2016.  It was an brilliant event, on a beautiful stage at Picturehouse Central in Picadilly Circus in London.

You're welcome to view the slides or download them as a PDF, or watch my talk below.

And for the techies who want to skip the slide fluff and get their hands dirty, setup your OpenStack and LXD and start streamlining your HPC workloads using this guide.




Enjoy,
:-Dustin

Read more
Stéphane Graber

LXD logo

Introduction

Today I’m very pleased to announce the release of LXC 2.0, our second Long Term Support Release! LXC 2.0 is the result of a year of work by the LXC community with over 700 commits done by over 90 contributors!

It joins LXCFS 2.0 which was released last week and will very soon be joined by LXD 2.0 to complete our collection of 2.0 container management tools!

What’s new?

The complete changelog is linked below but the main highlights for me are:

  • More consistent user experience between the various LXC tools.
  • Improved checkpoint/restore support.
  • Complete rework of our CGroup handling code, including support for the CGroup namespace.
  • Cleaned up storage backend subsystem, including the addition of a new Ceph RBD backend.
  • A massive amount of bugfixes.
  • And lastly, we managed to get all that done without breaking our API, so LXC 2.0 is fully API compatible with LXC 1.0.

The focus with this release was stability and maintaining support for all the environments in which LXC shines. We still support all kernels from 2.6.32 though the exact feature set does obviously vary based on kernel features. We also improved support for a bunch of architectures and fixed a lot of bugs and other rough edges.

This is the release you want to run in production for the next few years!

Support length

As mentioned, LXC 2.0 is a Long Term Support release.
This is the second time we do such a release with the first being LXC 1.0.

Long Term Support releases come with a 5 years commitment from upstream to do bugfixes and security updates and release new point releases when enough fixes have accumulated.

The end of life date for the various LXC versions is as follow:

  • LXC 1.0, released February 2014 will EOL on the 1st of June 2019
  • LXC 1.1, released February 2015 will EOL on the 1st of September 2016
  • LXC 2.0, released April 2016 will EOL on the 1st of June 2021

We therefore very strongly recommend LXC 1.1 users to update to LXC 2.0 as we will not be supporting this release for very much longer.

We also recommend production deployments stick to our Long Term Support release.

Project information

Upstream website: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/
Release announcement: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/news/
Code: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
IRC channel: #lxcontainers on irc.freenode.net
Mailing-lists: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org

Try it online

Want to see what a container with LXC 2.0 installed feels like?
You can get one online to play with here.

Read more
Dustin Kirkland



I had the opportunity to speak at Container World 2016 in Santa Clara yesterday.  Thanks in part to the Netflix guys who preceded me, the room was absolutely packed!

You can download a PDF of my slides here, or flip through them embedded below.

I'd really encourage you to try the demo instructions of LXD toward the end!


:-Dustin

Read more
Dustin Kirkland


Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial) is only a few short weeks away, and with it comes one of the most exciting new features Linux has seen in a very long time...

ZFS -- baked directly into Ubuntu -- supported by Canonical.

What is ZFS?

ZFS is a combination of a volume manager (like LVM) and a filesystem (like ext4, xfs, or btrfs).

ZFS one of the most beloved features of Solaris, universally coveted by every Linux sysadmin with a Solaris background.  To our delight, we're happy to make to OpenZFS available on every Ubuntu system.  Ubuntu's reference guide for ZFS can be found here, and these are a few of the killer features:
  • snapshots
  • copy-on-write cloning
  • continuous integrity checking against data corruption
  • automatic repair
  • efficient data compression.
These features truly make ZFS the perfect filesystem for containers.

What does "support" mean?

  • You'll find zfs.ko automatically built and installed on your Ubuntu systems.  No more DKMS-built modules!
$ locate zfs.ko
/lib/modules/4.4.0-4-generic/kernel/zfs/zfs/zfs.ko
  • You'll see the module loaded automatically if you use it.

$ lsmod | grep zfs
zfs 2801664 11
zunicode 331776 1 zfs
zcommon 57344 1 zfs
znvpair 90112 2 zfs,zcommon
spl 102400 3 zfs,zcommon,znvpair
zavl 16384 1 zfs

  • The user space zfsutils-linux package will be included in Ubuntu Main, with security updates provided by Canonical (as soon as this MIR is completed).
  • As always, industry leading, enterprise class technical support is available from Canonical with Ubuntu Advantage services.

How do I get started?

It's really quite simple!  Here's a few commands to get you up and running with ZFS and LXD in 60 seconds or less.

First, make sure you're running Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial).

$ head -n1 /etc/issue
Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) \n \l

Now, let's install lxd and zfsutils-linux, if you haven't already:

$ sudo apt install lxd zfsutils-linux

Next, let's use the interactive lxd init command to setup LXD and ZFS.  In the example below, I'm simply using a sparse, loopback file for the ZFS pool.  For best results (and what I use on my laptop and production servers), it's best to use a raw SSD partition or device.

$ sudo lxd init
Name of the storage backend to use (dir or zfs): zfs
Create a new ZFS pool (yes/no)? yes
Name of the new ZFS pool: lxd
Would you like to use an existing block device (yes/no)? no
Size in GB of the new loop device (1GB minimum): 2
Would you like LXD to be available over the network (yes/no)? no
LXD has been successfully configured.

We can check our ZFS pool now:

$ sudo zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
lxd 1.98G 450K 1.98G - 0% 0% 1.00x ONLINE -

$ sudo zpool status
pool: lxd
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
lxd ONLINE 0 0 0
/var/lib/lxd/zfs.img ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors

$ lxc config get storage.zfs_pool_name
storage.zfs_pool_name: lxd

Finally, let's import the Ubuntu LXD image, and launch a few containers.  Note how fast containers launch, which is enabled by the ZFS cloning and copy-on-write features:

$ newgrp lxd
$ lxd-images import ubuntu --alias ubuntu
Downloading the GPG key for http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com
Progress: 48 %
Validating the GPG signature of /tmp/tmpa71cw5wl/download.json.asc
Downloading the image.
Image manifest: http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/server/releases/trusty/release-20160201/ubuntu-14.04-server-cloudimg-amd64.manifest
Image imported as: 54c8caac1f61901ed86c68f24af5f5d3672bdc62c71d04f06df3a59e95684473
Setup alias: ubuntu

$ for i in $(seq 1 5); do lxc launch ubuntu; done
...
$ lxc list
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| NAME | STATE | IPV4 | IPV6 | EPHEMERAL | SNAPSHOTS |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| discordant-loria | RUNNING | 10.0.3.130 (eth0) | | NO | 0 |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| fictive-noble | RUNNING | 10.0.3.91 (eth0) | | NO | 0 |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| interprotoplasmic-essie | RUNNING | 10.0.3.242 (eth0) | | NO | 0 |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| nondamaging-cain | RUNNING | 10.0.3.9 (eth0) | | NO | 0 |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+
| untreasurable-efrain | RUNNING | 10.0.3.89 (eth0) | | NO | 0 |
+-------------------------+---------+-------------------+------+-----------+-----------+

Super easy, right?

Cheers,
:-Dustin

Read more
Dustin Kirkland


There's no shortage of excitement, controversy, and readership, any time you can work "Docker" into a headline these days.  Perhaps a bit like "Donald Trump", but for CIO tech blogs and IT news -- a real hot button.  Hey, look, I even did it myself in the title of this post!

Sometimes an article even starts out about CoreOS, but gets diverted into a discussion about Docker, like this one, where shykes (Docker's founder and CTO) announced that Docker's default image would be moving away from Ubuntu to Alpine Linux.


I have personally been Canonical's business and technical point of contact with Docker Inc, since September of 2013, when I co-presented at an OpenStack Meetup in Austin, Texas, with Ben Golub and Nick Stinemates of Docker.  I can tell you that, along with most of the rest of the Docker community, this casual declaration in an unrelated Hacker News thread, came as a surprise to nearly all of us!

Docker's default container image is certainly Docker's decision to make.  But it would be prudent to examine at a few facts:

(1) Check DockerHub and you may notice that while Busybox (Alpine Linux) has surpassed Ubuntu in the number downloads (66M to 40M), Ubuntu is still by far the most "popular" by number of "stars" -- likes, favorites, +1's, whatever, (3.2K to 499).

(2) Ubuntu's compressed, minimal root tarball is 59 MB, which is what is downloaded over the Internet.  That's different from the 188 MB uncompressed root filesystem, which has been quoted a number of times in the press.

(3) The real magic of Docker is such that you only ever download that base image, one time!  And you only store one copy of the uncompressed root filesystem on your disk! Just once, sudo docker pull ubuntu, on your laptop at home or work, and then launch thousands of images at a coffee shop or airport lounge with its spotty wifi.  Build derivative images, FROM ubuntu, etc. and you only ever store the incremental differences.

Actually, I encourage you to test that out yourself...  I just launched a t2.micro -- Amazon's cheapest instance type with the lowest networking bandwidth.  It took 15.938s to sudo apt install docker.io.  And it took 9.230s to sudo docker pull ubuntu.  It takes less time to download Ubuntu than to install Docker!

ubuntu@ip-172-30-0-129:~⟫ time sudo apt install docker.io -y
...
real 0m15.938s
user 0m2.146s
sys 0m0.913s

As compared to...

ubuntu@ip-172-30-0-129:~⟫ time sudo docker pull ubuntu
latest: Pulling from ubuntu
f15ce52fc004: Pull complete
c4fae638e7ce: Pull complete
a4c5be5b6e59: Pull complete
8693db7e8a00: Pull complete
ubuntu:latest: The image you are pulling has been verified. Important: image verification is a tech preview feature and should not be relied on to provide security.
Digest: sha256:457b05828bdb5dcc044d93d042863fba3f2158ae249a6db5ae3934307c757c54
Status: Downloaded newer image for ubuntu:latest
real 0m9.230s
user 0m0.021s
sys 0m0.016s

Now, sure, it takes even less than that to download Alpine Linux (0.747s by my test), but again you only ever do that once!  After you have your initial image, launching Docker containers take the exact same amount of time (0.233s) and identical storage differences.  See:

ubuntu@ip-172-30-0-129:/tmp/docker⟫ time sudo docker run alpine /bin/true
real 0m0.233s
user 0m0.014s
sys 0m0.001s
ubuntu@ip-172-30-0-129:/tmp/docker⟫ time sudo docker run ubuntu /bin/true
real 0m0.234s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m0.002s

(4) I regularly communicate sincere, warm congratulations to our friends at Docker Inc, on its continued growth.  shykes publicly mentioned the hiring of the maintainer of Alpine Linux in that Hacker News post.  As a long time Linux distro developer myself, I have tons of respect for everyone involved in building a high quality Linux distribution.  In fact, Canonical employs over 700 people, in 44 countries, working around the clock, all calendar year, to make Ubuntu the world's most popular Linux OS.  Importantly, that includes a dedicated security team that has an outstanding track record over the last 12 years, keeping Ubuntu servers, clouds, desktops, laptops, tablets, and phones up-to-date and protected against the latest security vulnerabilities.  I don't know personally Natanael, but I'm intimately aware of what a spectacular amount of work it is to maintain and secure an OS distribution, as it makes its way into enterprise and production deployments.  Good luck!

(5) There are currently 5,854 packages available via apk in Alpine Linux (sudo docker run alpine apk search -v).  There are 8,862 packages in Ubuntu Main (officially supported by Canonical), and 53,150 binary packages across all of Ubuntu Main, Universe, Restricted, and Multiverse, supported by the greater Ubuntu community.  Nearly all 50,000+ packages are updated every 6 months, on time, every time, and we release an LTS version of Ubuntu and the best of open source software in the world every 2 years.  Like clockwork.  Choice.  Velocity.  Stability.  That's what Ubuntu brings.

Docker holds a special place in the Ubuntu ecosystem, and Ubuntu has been instrumental in Docker's growth over the last 3 years.  Where we go from here, is largely up to the cross-section of our two vibrant communities.

And so I ask you honestly...what do you want to see?  How would you like to see Docker and Ubuntu operate together?

I'm Canonical's Product Manager for Ubuntu Server, I'm responsible for Canonical's relationship with Docker Inc, and I will read absolutely every comment posted below.

Cheers,
:-Dustin

p.s. I'm speaking at Container Summit in New York City today, and wrote this post from the top of the (inspiring!) One World Observatory at the World Trade Center this morning.  Please come up and talk to me, if you want to share your thoughts (at Container Summit, not the One World Observatory)!


Read more
Dustin Kirkland


As always, I enjoyed speaking at the SCALE14x event, especially at the new location in Pasadena, California!

What if you could adapt a package from a newer version of Ubuntu, onto your stable LTS desktop/server?

Or, as a developer, what if you could provide your latest releases to your users running an older LTS version of Ubuntu?

Introducing adapt!

adapt is a lot like apt...  It’s a simple command that installs packages.

But it “adapts” a requested version to run on your current system.

It's a simple command that installs any package from any release of Ubuntu into any version of Ubuntu.

How does adapt work?

Simple… Containers!

More specifically, LXD system containers.

Why containers?

Containers can run anywhere, physical, virtual, desktops, servers, and any CPU architecture.

And containers are light and fast!  Zero latency and no virtualization overhead.

Most importantly, system containers are perfect copies of the released distribution, the operating system itself.

And all of that continuous integration testing we do perform on every single Ubuntu release?

We leverage that!
You can download a PDF of the slides for my talk here, or flip through them here:



I hope you enjoy some of the magic that LXD is making possible ;-)

Cheers!
Dustin

Read more
pitti

The last two major autopkgtest releases (3.18 from November, and 3.19 fresh from yesterday) bring some new features that are worth spreading.

New LXD virtualization backend

3.19 debuts the new adt-virt-lxd virtualization backend. In case you missed it, LXD is an API/CLI layer on top of LXC which introduces proper image management, seamlessly use images and containers on remote locations, intelligently caching them locally, automatically configure performant storage backends like zfs or btrfs, and just generally feels really clean and much simpler to use than the “classic” LXC.

Setting it up is not complicated at all. Install the lxd package (possibly from the backports PPA if you are on 14.04 LTS), and add your user to the lxd group. Then you can add the standard LXD image server with

  lxc remote add lco https://images.linuxcontainers.org:8443

and use the image to run e. g. the libpng test from the archive:

  adt-run libpng --- lxd lco:ubuntu/trusty/i386
  adt-run libpng --- lxd lco:debian/sid/amd64

The adt-virt-lxd.1 manpage explains this in more detail, also how to use this to run tests in a container on a remote host (how cool is that!), and how to build local images with the usual autopkgtest customizations/optimizations using adt-build-lxd.

I have btrfs running on my laptop, and LXD/autopkgtest automatically use that, so the performance really rocks. Kudos to Stéphane, Serge, Tycho, and the other LXD authors!

The motivation for writing this was to make it possible to move our armhf testing into the cloud (which for $REASONS requires remote containers), but I now have a feeling that soon this will completely replace the existing adt-virt-lxc virt backend, as its much nicer to use.

It is covered by the same regression tests as the LXC runner, and from the perspective of package tests that you run in it it should behave very similar to LXC. The one problem I’m aware of is that autopkgtest-reboot-prepare is broken, but hardly anything is using that yet. This is a bit complicated to fix, but I expect it will be in the next few weeks.

MaaS setup script

While most tests are not particularly sensitive about which kind of hardware/platform they run on, low-level software like the Linux kernel, GL libraries, X.org drivers, or Mir very much are. There is a plan for extending our automatic tests to real hardware for these packages, and being able to run autopkgtests on real iron is one important piece of that puzzle.

MaaS (Metal as a Service) provides just that — it manages a set of machines and provides an API for installing, talking to, and releasing them. The new maas autopkgtest ssh setup script (for the adt-virt-ssh backend) brings together autopkgtest and real hardware. Once you have a MaaS setup, get your API key from the web UI, then you can run a test like this:

  adt-run libpng --- ssh -s maas -- \
     --acquire "arch=amd64 tags=touchscreen" -r wily \
     http://my.maas.server/MAAS 123DEADBEEF:APIkey

The required arguments are the MaaS URL and the API key. Without any further options you will get any available machine installed with the default release. But usually you want to select a particular one by architecture and/or tags, and install a particular distro release, which you can do with the -r/--release and --acquire options.

Note that this is not wired into Ubuntu’s production CI environment, but it will be.

Selectively using packages from -proposed

Up until a few weeks ago, autopkgtest runs in the CI environment were always seeing/using the entirety of -proposed. This often led to lockups where an application foo and one of its dependencies libbar got a new version in -proposed at the same time, and on test regressions it was not clear at all whose fault it was. This often led to perfectly good packages being stuck in -proposed for a long time, and a lot of manual investigation about root causes.

.

These days we are using a more fine-grained approach: A test run is now specific for a “trigger”, that is, the new package in -proposed (e. g. a new version of libbar) that caused the test (e. g. for “foo”) to run. autopkgtest sets up apt pinning so that only the binary packages for the trigger come from -proposed, the rest from -release. This provides much better isolation between the mush of often hundreds of packages that get synced or uploaded every day.

This new behaviour is controlled by an extension of the --apt-pocket option. So you can say

  adt-run --apt-pocket=proposed=src:foo,libbar1,libbar-data ...

and then only the binaries from the foo source, libbar1, and libbar-data will come from -proposed, everything else from -release.

Caveat:Unfortunately apt’s pinning is rather limited. As soon as any of the explicitly listed packages depends on a package or version that is only available in -proposed, apt falls over and refuses the installation instead of taking the required dependencies from -proposed as well. In that case, adt-run falls back to the previous behaviour of using no pinning at all. (This unfortunately got worse with apt 1.1, bug report to be done). But it’s still helpful in many cases that don’t involve library transitions or other package sets that need to land in lockstep.

Unified testbed setup script

There is a number of changes that need to be made to testbeds so that tests can run with maximum performance (like running dpkg through eatmydata, disabling apt translations, or automatically using the host’s apt-cacher-ng), reliable apt sources, and in a minimal environment (to detect missing dependencies and avoid interference from unrelated services — these days the standard cloud images have a lot of unnecessary fat). There is also a choice whether to apply these only once (every day) to an autopkgtest specific base image, or on the fly to the current ephemeral testbed for every test run (via --setup-commands). Over time this led to quite a lot of code duplication between adt-setup-vm, adt-build-lxc, the new adt-build-lxd, cloud-vm-setup, and create-nova-image-new-release.

I now cleaned this up, and there is now just a single setup-commands/setup-testbed script which works for all kinds of testbeds (LXC, LXD, QEMU images, cloud instances) and both for preparing an image with adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud, adt-build-lx[cd] or nova, and with preparing just the current ephemeral testbed via --setup-commands.

While this is mostly an internal refactorization, it does impact users who previously used the adt-setup-vm script for e. g. building Debian images with vmdebootstrap. This script is now gone, and the generic setup-testbed entirely replaces it.

Misc

Aside from the above, every new version has a handful of bug fixes and minor improvements, see the git log for details. As always, if you are interested in helping out or contributing a new feature, don’t hesitate to contact me or file a bug report.

Read more
Stéphane Graber

TLDR: NorthSec is an incredible security event, our CTF simulates a whole internet for every participating team. This allows us to create just about anything, from a locked down country to millions of vulnerable IoT devices spread across the globe. However that flexibility comes at a high cost hardware-wise, as we’re getting bigger and bigger, we need more and more powerful servers and networking gear. We’re very actively looking for sponsors so get in touch with me or just buy us something on Amazon!

What’s NorthSec?

NorthSec is one of the biggest on-site Capture The Flag (CTF), security contest in North America. It’s organized yearly over a weekend in Montreal (usually in May) and since the last edition, has been accompanied by a two days security conference before the CTF itself. The rest of this post will only focus on the CTF part though.

the-room

A view of the main room at NorthSec 2015

Teams arrive at the venue on Friday evening, get setup at their table and then get introduced to this year’s scenario and given access to our infrastructure. There they will have to fight their way through challenges, each earning them points and letting them go further and further. On Sunday afternoon, the top 3 teams are awarded their prize and we wrap up for the year.

Size wise, for the past two years we’ve had a physical limit of up to 32 teams of 8 participants and then a bunch of extra unaffiliated visitors. For the 2016 edition, we’re raising this to 50 teams for a grand total of 400 participants, thanks to some shuffling at the venue making some more room for us.

Why is it special?

The above may sound pretty simple and straightforward, however there are a few important details that sets NorthSec apart from other CTFs.

  • It is entirely on-site. There are some very big online CTFs out there but very few on-site ones. Having everyone participating in the same room is valuable from a networking point of view but also ensures fairness by enforcing fixed size teams and equal network bandwidth and latency.
  • Every team gets its very own copy of the whole infrastructure. There are no shared services in the simulated world we provide them. That means one team’s actions cannot impact another.
  • Each simulation is its own virtual world with its own instance of the internet, we use hundreds of LXC containers and thousands of VLANs and networks FOR EVERY TEAM to provide the most realistic and complete environment you can think of.
World map of our fake internet

World map of our fake internet

What’s our infrastructure like?

Due to the very high bandwidth and low latency requirements, most of the infrastructure is hosted on premises and on our hardware. We do plan on offloading Windows virtual machines to a public cloud for the next edition though.

We also provide a mostly legacy free environment to our contestants, all of our challenges are connected to IPv6-only networks and run on 64bit Ubuntu LTS  in LXC with state of the art security configurations.

Our rack

Our rack, on location at NorthSec 2015

 

All in all, for 32 teams (last year’s edition), we had:

  • 48000 virtual network interfaces
  • 2000 virtual carriers
  • 16000 BGP routers
  • 17000 Ubuntu containers
  • 100 Windows virtual machines
  • 20000 routing table entries

And all of that was running on:

  • Two firewalls (DELL SC1425)
  • Two infrastructure servers (DELL SC1425)
  • One management server (HP DL380 G5)
  • Four main contest hosts (HP DL380 G5)
  • Three backup contest hosts (DELL C6100)

On average we had 7 full simulations and 21 virtual machines running on every host (the backup hosts only had one each). That means each of the main contest hosts had:

  • 10500 virtual network interfaces
  • 435 virtual carriers
  • 3500 BGP routers
  • 3700 Ubuntu containers
  • 21 Windows virtual machines
  • 4375 routing table entries

Not too bad for servers that are (SC1425) or are getting close (DL380 G5) to being 10 years old now.

Past infrastructure challenges

In the past editions we’ve found numerous bugs in the various technologies we use when put under such a crazy load:

  • A variety of switch firmware bugs when dealing with several thousand IPv6-only networks.
  • Multiple Linux IPv6 kernel bugs (and one security issue) also related to an excess of IPv6 multicast traffic.
  • Several memory leaks and other bugs in LXC and related components that become very visible when you’re running upwards of 10000 containers.
  • Several more Linux kernel bugs related to performance scaling as we create more and more namespaces and nested namespaces.

As our infrastructure staff is very invested in these technologies by being upstream developers or contributors to the main projects we use, those bugs were all rapidly reported, discussed and fixed. We always look forward to the next NorthSec as an opportunity to test the latest technology at scale in a completely controlled environment.

How can you help?

As I mentioned, we’ve been capped at 32 teams and around 300 attendees for the past two years. Our existing hardware was barely sufficient  to handle  the load during those two editions, we urgently need to refresh our hardware to offer the best possible experience to our participants.

We’re planning on replacing most if not all of our hardware with slightly more recent equivalents, also upgrading from rotating drives to SSDs and improving our network. On the software side, we’ll be upgrading to a newer Linux kernel, possibly to Ubuntu 16.04, switch from btrfs to zfs and from LXC to LXD.

We are a Canadian non-profit organization with all our staff being volunteers so we very heavily rely on sponsors to be able to make the event a success.

If you or your company would like to help by sponsoring our infrastructure, get in touch with me. We have several sponsoring levels and can get you the visibility you’d like, ranging from a mention on our website and at the event to on-site presence with a recruitment booth and even, if our interests align, inclusion of your product in some of our challenges.

We also have an Amazon wishlist of smaller (cheaper) items that we need to buy in the near future. If you buy something from the list, get in touch so we can properly thank you!

Oh and as I briefly mentioned at the beginning, we have a two days, single-track conference ahead of the CTF. We’re actively looking for speakers, if you have something interesting to present, the CFP is here.

Extra resources

Read more
Dustin Kirkland


Picture yourself containers on a server
With systemd trees and spawned tty's
Somebody calls you, you answer quite quickly
A world with the density so high

    - Sgt. Graber's LXD Smarts Club Band

Last week, we proudly released Ubuntu 15.10 (Wily) -- the final developer snapshot of the Ubuntu Server before we focus the majority of our attention on quality, testing, performance, documentation, and stability for the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS cycle in the next 6 months.

Notably, LXD has been promoted to the Ubuntu Main archive, now commercially supported by Canonical.  That has enabled us to install LXD by default on all Ubuntu Servers, from 15.10 forward.
Join us for an interactive, live webinar on November 12th at 5pm BST/12pm EST led by James Page, where he will demonstrate LXD as the fastest hypervisor in OpenStack!
That means that every Ubuntu server -- Intel, AMD, ARM, POWER, and even Virtual Machines in the cloud -- is now a full machine container hypervisor, capable of hosting hundreds of machine containers, right out of the box!

LXD in the Sky with Diamonds!  Well, LXD is in the Cloud with Diamond level support from Canonical, anyway.  You can even test it in your web browser here.

The development tree of Xenial (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS) has already inherited this behavior, and we will celebrate this feature broadly through our use of LXD containers in Juju, MAAS, and the reference platform of Ubuntu OpenStack, as well as the new nova-lxd hypervisor in the OpenStack Autopilot within Landscape.

While the young and the restless are already running Wily Ubuntu 15.10, the bold and the beautiful are still bound to their Trusty Ubuntu 14.04 LTS servers.

At Canonical, we understand both motivations, and this is why we have backported LXD to the Trusty archives, for safe, simple consumption and testing of this new generation of machine containers there, on your stable LTS.

Installing LXD on Trusty simply requires enabling the trusty-backports pocket, and installing the lxd package from there, with these 3 little commands:

sudo sed -i -e "/trusty-backports/ s/^# //" /etc/apt/sources.list
sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -y
sudo apt-get -t trusty-backports install lxd

In minutes, you can launch your first LXD containers.  First, inherit your new group permissions, so you can execute the lxc command as your non-root user.  Then, import some images, and launch a new container named lovely-rita.  Shell into that container, and examine the process tree, install some packages, check the disk and memory and cpu available.  Finally, exit when you're done, and optionally delete the container.

newgrp lxd
lxd-images import ubuntu --alias ubuntu
lxc launch ubuntu lovely-rita
lxc list
lxc exec lovely-rita bash
ps -ef
apt-get update
df -h
free
cat /proc/cpuinfo
exit
lxc delete lovely-rita

I was able to run over 600 containers simultaneously on my Thinkpad (x250, 16GB of RAM), and over 60 containers on an m1.small in Amazon (1.6GB of RAM).

We're very interested in your feedback, as LXD is one of the most important features of the Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.  You can learn more about LXD, view the source code, file bugs, discuss on the mailing list, and peruse the Linux Containers upstream projects.

With a little help from my friends!
:-Dustin

Read more
Dustin Kirkland


Canonical is delighted to sponsor ContainerCon 2015, a Linux Foundation event in Seattle next week, August 17-19, 2015. It's quite exciting to see the A-list of sponsors, many of them newcomers to this particular technology, teaming with energy around containers. 

From chroots to BSD Jails and Solaris Zones, the concepts behind containers were established decades ago, and in fact traverse the spectrum of server operating systems. At Canonical, we've been working on containers in Ubuntu for more than half a decade, providing a home and resources for stewardship and maintenance of the upstream Linux Containers (LXC) project since 2010.

Last year, we publicly shared our designs for LXD -- a new stratum on top of LXC that endows the advantages of a traditional hypervisor into the faster, more efficient world of containers.

Those designs are now reality, with the open source Golang code readily available on Github, and Ubuntu packages available in a PPA for all supported releases of Ubuntu, and already in the Ubuntu 15.10 beta development tree. With ease, you can launch your first LXD containers in seconds, following this simple guide.

LXD is a persistent daemon that provides a clean RESTful interface to manage (start, stop, clone, migrate, etc.) any of the containers on a given host.

Hosts running LXD are handily federated into clusters of container hypervisors, and can work as Nova Compute nodes in OpenStack, for example, delivering Infrastructure-as-a-Service cloud technology at lower costs and greater speeds.

Here, LXD and Docker are quite complementary technologies. LXD furnishes a dynamic platform for "system containers" -- containers that behave like physical or virtual machines, supplying all of the functionality of a full operating system (minus the kernel, which is shared with the host). Such "machine containers" are the core of IaaS clouds, where users focus on instances with compute, storage, and networking that behave like traditional datacenter hardware.

LXD runs perfectly well along with Docker, which supplies a framework for "application containers" -- containers that enclose individual processes that often relate to one another as pools of micro services and deliver complex web applications.

Moreover, the Zen of LXD is the fact that the underlying container implementation is actually decoupled from the RESTful API that drives LXD functionality. We are most excited to discuss next week at ContainerCon our work with Microsoft around the LXD RESTful API, as a cross-platform container management layer.

Ben Armstrong, a Principal Program Manager Lead at Microsoft on the core virtualization and container technologies, has this to say:
“As Microsoft is working to bring Windows Server Containers to the world – we are excited to see all the innovation happening across the industry, and have been collaborating with many projects to encourage and foster this environment. Canonical’s LXD project is providing a new way for people to look at and interact with container technologies. Utilizing ‘system containers’ to bring the advantages of container technology to the core of your cloud infrastructure is a great concept. We are looking forward to seeing the results of our engagement with Canonical in this space.”
Finally, if you're in Seattle next week, we hope you'll join us for the technical sessions we're leading at ContainerCon 2015, including: "Putting the D in LXD: Migration of Linux Containers", "Container Security - Past, Present, and Future", and "Large Scale Container Management with LXD and OpenStack". Details are below.
Date: Monday, August 17 • 2:20pm - 3:10pm
Title: Large Scale Container Management with LXD and OpenStack
Speaker: Stéphane Graber
Abstracthttp://sched.co/3YK6
Location: Grand Ballroom B
Schedulehttp://sched.co/3YK6 
Date: Wednesday, August 19 10:25am-11:15am
Title: Putting the D in LXD: Migration of Linux Containers
Speaker: Tycho Andersen
Abstract: http://sched.co/3YTz
Location: Willow A
Schedule: http://sched.co/3YTz
Date: Wednesday, August 19 • 3:00pm - 3:50pm
Title: Container Security - Past, Present and Future
Speaker: Serge Hallyn
Abstract: http://sched.co/3YTl
Location: Ravenna
Schedule: http://sched.co/3YTl
Cheers,
Dustin

Read more
Dustin Kirkland

652 Linux containers running on a Laptop?  Are you kidding me???

A couple of weeks ago, at the OpenStack Summit in Vancouver, Canonical released the results of some scalability testing of Linux containers (LXC) managed by LXD.

Ryan Harper and James Page presented their results -- some 536 Linux containers on a very modest little Intel server (16GB of RAM), versus 37 KVM virtual machines.

Ryan has published the code he used for the benchmarking, and I've used to to reproduce the test on my dev laptop (Thinkpad x230, 16GB of RAM, Intel i7-3520M).

I managed to pack a whopping 652 Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty) containers on my Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid) laptop!


The system load peaked at 1056 (!!!), but I was using merely 56% of 15.4GB of system memory.  Amazingly, my Unity desktop and Byobu command line were still perfectly responsive, as were the containers that I ssh'd into.  (Aside: makes me wonder if the Linux system load average is accounting for container process correctly...)


Check out the process tree for a few hundred system containers here!

As for KVM, I managed to launch 31 virtual machines without KSM enabled, and 65 virtual machines with KSM enabled and working hard.  So that puts somewhere between 10x - 21x as many containers as virtual machines on the same laptop.

You can now repeat these tests, if you like.  Please share your results with #LXD on Google+ or Twitter!

I'd love to see someone try this in AWS, anywhere from an m3.small to an r3.8xlarge, and share your results ;-)

Density test instructions

## Install lxd
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-lxc/lxd-git-master
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get install -y lxd bzr
$ cd /tmp
## At this point, it's a good idea to logout/login or reboot
## for your new group permissions to get applied
## Grab the tests, disable the tools download
$ bzr branch lp:~raharper/+junk/density-check
$ cd density-check
$ mkdir lxd_tools
## Periodically squeeze your cache
$ sudo bash -x -c 'while true; do sleep 30; \
echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; \
free; done' &
## Run the LXD test
$ ./density-check-lxd --limit=mem:512m --load=idle release=trusty arch=amd64
## Run the KVM test
$ ./density-check-kvm --limit=mem:512m --load=idle release=trusty arch=amd64

As for the speed-of-launch test, I'll cover that in a follow-up post!

Can you contain your excitement?

Cheers!
Dustin

Read more
Stéphane Graber

Introduction

For the past 6 months, Serge Hallyn, Tycho Andersen, Chuck Short, Ryan Harper and myself have been very busy working on a new container project called LXD.

Ubuntu 15.04, due to be released this Thursday, will contain LXD 0.7 in its repository. This is still the early days and while we’re confident LXD 0.7 is functional and ready for users to experiment, we still have some work to do before it’s ready for critical production use.

LXD logo

So what’s LXD?

LXD is what we call our container “lightervisor”. The core of LXD is a daemon which offers a REST API to drive full system containers just like you’d drive virtual machines.

The LXD daemon runs on every container host and client tools then connect to those to manage those containers or to move or copy them to another LXD.

We provide two such clients:

  • A command line tool called “lxc”
  • An OpenStack Nova plugin called nova-compute-lxd

The former is mostly aimed at small deployments ranging from a single machine (your laptop) to a few dozen hosts. The latter seamlessly integrates inside your OpenStack infrastructure and lets you manage containers exactly like you would virtual machines.

Why LXD?

LXC has been around for about 7 years now, it evolved from a set of very limited tools which would get you something only marginally better than a chroot, all the way to the stable set of tools, stable library and active user and development community that we have today.

Over those years, a lot of extra security features were added to the Linux kernel and LXC grew support for all of them. As we saw the need for people to build their own solution on top of LXC, we’ve developed a public API and a set of bindings. And last year, we’ve put out our first long term support release which has been a great success so far.

That being said, for a while now, we’ve been wanting to do a few big changes:

  • Make LXC secure by default (rather than it being optional).
  • Completely rework the tools to make them simpler and less confusing to newcomers.
  • Rely on container images rather than using “templates” to build them locally.
  • Proper checkpoint/restore support (live migration).

Unfortunately, solving any of those means doing very drastic changes to LXC which would likely break our existing users or at least force them to rethink the way they do things.

Instead, LXD is our opportunity to start fresh. We’re keeping LXC as the great low level container manager that it is. And build LXD on top of it, using LXC’s API to do all the low level work. That achieves the best of both worlds, we keep our low level container manager with its API and bindings but skip using its tools and templates, instead replacing those by the new experience that LXD provides.

How does LXD relate to LXC, Docker, Rocket and other container projects?

LXD is currently based on top of LXC. It uses the stable LXC API to do all the container management behind the scene, adding the REST API on top and providing a much simpler, more consistent user experience.

The focus of LXD is on system containers. That is, a container which runs a clean copy of a Linux distribution or a full appliance. From a design perspective, LXD doesn’t care about what’s running in the container.

That’s very different from Docker or Rocket which are application container managers (as opposed to system container managers) and so focus on distributing apps as containers and so very much care about what runs inside the container.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with using LXD to run a bunch of full containers which then run Docker or Rocket inside of them to run their different applications. So letting LXD manage the host resources for you, applying all the security restrictions to make the container safe and then using whatever application distribution mechanism you want inside.

Getting started with LXD

The simplest way for somebody to try LXD is by using it with its command line tool. This can easily be done on your laptop or desktop machine.

On an Ubuntu 15.04 system (or by using ppa:ubuntu-lxc/lxd-stable on 14.04 or above), you can install LXD with:

sudo apt-get install lxd

Then either logout and login again to get your group membership refreshed, or use:

newgrp lxd

From that point on, you can interact with your newly installed LXD daemon.

The “lxc” command line tool lets you interact with one or multiple LXD daemons. By default it will interact with the local daemon, but you can easily add more of them.

As an easy way to start experimenting with remote servers, you can add our public LXD server at https://images.linuxcontainers.org:8443
That server is an image-only read-only server, so all you can do with it is list images, copy images from it or start containers from it.

You’ll have to do the following to: add the server, list all of its images and then start a container from one of them:

lxc remote add images images.linuxcontainers.org
lxc image list images:
lxc launch images:ubuntu/trusty/i386 ubuntu-32

What the above does is define a new “remote” called “images” which points to images.linuxcontainers.org. Then list all of its images and finally start a local container called “ubuntu-32” from the ubuntu/trusty/i386 image. The image will automatically be cached locally so that future containers are started instantly.

The “<remote name>:” syntax is used throughout the lxc client. When not specified, the default “local” remote is assumed. Should you only care about managing a remote server, the default remote can be changed with “lxc remote set-default”.

Now that you have a running container, you can check its status and IP information with:

lxc list

Or get even more details with:

lxc info ubuntu-32

To get a shell inside the container, or to run any other command that you want, you may do:

lxc exec ubuntu-32 /bin/bash

And you can also directly pull or push files from/to the container with:

lxc file pull ubuntu-32/path/to/file .
lxc file push /path/to/file ubuntu-32/

When done, you can stop or delete your container with one of those:

lxc stop ubuntu-32
lxc delete ubuntu-32

What’s next?

The above should be a reasonably comprehensive guide to how to use LXD on a single system. Of course, that’s not the most interesting thing to do with LXD. All the commands shown above can work against multiple hosts, containers can be remotely created, moved around, copied, …

LXD also supports live migration, snapshots, configuration profiles, device pass-through and more.

I intend to write some more posts to cover those use cases and features as well as highlight some of the work we’re currently busy doing.

LXD is a pretty young but very active project. We’ve had great contributions from existing LXC developers as well as newcomers.

The project is entirely developed in the open at https://github.com/lxc/lxd. We keep track of upcoming features and improvements through the project’s issue tracker, so it’s easy to see what will be coming soon. We also have a set of issues marked “Easy” which are meant for new contributors as easy ways to get to know the LXD code and contribute to the project.

LXD is an Apache2 licensed project, written in Go and which doesn’t require a CLA to contribute to (we do however require the standard DCO Signed-off-by). It can be built with both golang and gccgo and so works on almost all architectures.

Extra resources

More information can be found on the official LXD website:
https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd

The code, issues and pull requests can all be found on Github:
https://github.com/lxc/lxd

And a good overview of the LXD design and its API may be found in our specs:
https://github.com/lxc/lxd/tree/master/specs

Conclusion

LXD is a new and exciting project. It’s an amazing opportunity to think fresh about system containers and provide the best user experience possible, alongside great features and rock solid security.

With 7 releases and close to a thousand commits by 20 contributors, it’s a very active, fast paced project. Lots of things still remain to be implemented before we get to our 1.0 milestone release in early 2016 but looking at what was achieved in just 5 months, I’m confident we’ll have an incredible LXD in another 12 months!

For now, we’d welcome your feedback, so install LXD, play around with it, file bugs and let us know what’s important for you next.

Read more
Dustin Kirkland

Earlier this week, here in Paris, at the OpenStack Design Summit, Mark Shuttleworth and Canonical introduced our vision and proof of concept for LXD.

You can find the official blog post on Canonical Insights, and a short video introduction on Youtube (by yours truly).

Our Canonical colleague Stephane Graber posted a bit more technical design detail here on the lxc-devel mailing list, which was picked up by HackerNews.  And LWN published a story yesterday covering another Canonical colleague of ours, Serge Hallyn, and his work on Cgroups and CGManager, all of which feeds into LXD.  As it happens, Stephane and Serge are upstream co-maintainers of Linux Containers.  Tycho Andersen, another colleague of ours, has been working on CRIU, which was the heart of his amazing demo this week, live migrating a container running the cult classic 1st person shooter, Doom! between two containers, back and forth.


Moreover, we've answered a few journalists' questions for excellent articles on ZDnet and SynergyMX.  Predictably, El Reg is skeptical (which isn't necessarily a bad thing).  But unfortunately, The Var Guy doesn't quite understand the technology (and unfortunately uses this article to conflate LXD with other random Canonical/Ubuntu complaints).

In any case, here's a bit more about LXD, in my own words...

Our primary design goal with LXD, is to extend containers into process based systems that behave like virtual machines.

We love KVM for its total machine abstraction, as a full virtualization hypervisor.  Moreover, we love what Docker does for application level development, confinement, packaging, and distribution.

But as an operating system and Linux distribution, our customers are, in fact, asking us for complete operating systems that boot and function within a Linux Container's execution space, natively.

Linux Containers are essential to our reference architecture of OpenStack, where we co-locate multiple services on each host.  Nearly every host is a Nova compute node, as well as a Ceph storage node, and also run a couple of units of "OpenStack overhead", such as MySQL, RabbitMQ, MongoDB, etc.  Rather than running each of those services all on the same physical system, we actually put each of them in their own container, with their own IP address, namespace, cgroup, etc.  This gives us tremendous flexibility, in the orchestration of those services.  We're able to move (migrate, even live migrate) those services from one host to another.  With that, it becomes possible to "evacuate" a given host, by moving each contained set of services elsewhere, perhaps a larger or smaller system, and then shut down the unit (perhaps to replace a hard drive or memory, or repurpose it entirely).

Containers also enable us to similarly confine services on virtual machines themselves!  Let that sink in for a second...  A contained workload is able, then, to move from one virtual machine to another, to a bare metal system.  Even from one public cloud provider, to another public or private cloud!

The last two paragraphs capture a few best practices that what we've learned over the last few years implementing OpenStack for some of the largest telcos and financial services companies in the world.  What we're hearing from Internet service and cloud providers is not too dissimilar...  These customers have their own customers who want cloud instances that perform at bare metal equivalence.  They also want to maximize the utilization of their server hardware, sometimes by more densely packing workloads on given systems.

As such, LXD is then a convergence of several different customer requirements, and our experience deploying some massively complex, scalable workloads (a la OpenStack, Hadoop, and others) in enterprises. 

The rapid evolution of a few key technologies under and around LXC have recently made this dream possible.  Namely: User namespaces, Cgroups, SECCOMP, AppArmorCRIU, as well as the library abstraction that our external tools use to manage these containers as systems.

LXD is a new "hypervisor" in that it provides (REST) APIs that can manage Linux Containers.  This is a step function beyond where we've been to date: able to start and stop containers with local commands and, to a limited extent, libvirt, but not much more.  "Booting" a system, in a container, running an init system, bringing up network devices (without nasty hacks in the container's root filesystem), etc. was challenging, but we've worked our way all of these, and Ubuntu boots unmodified in Linux Containers today.

Moreover, LXD is a whole new semantic for turning any machine -- Intel, AMD, ARM, POWER, physical, or even a virtual machine (e.g. your cloud instances) -- into a system that can host and manage and start and stop and import and export and migrate multiple collections of services bundled within containers.

I've received a number of questions about the "hardware assisted" containerization slide in my deck.  We're under confidentiality agreements with vendors as to the details and timelines for these features.

What (I think) I can say, is that there are hardware vendors who are rapidly extending some of the key features that have made cloud computing and virtualization practical, toward the exciting new world of Linux Containers.  Perhaps you might read a bit about CPU VT extensions, No Execute Bits, and similar hardware security technologies.  Use your imagination a bit, and you can probably converge on a few key concepts that will significantly extend the usefulness of Linux Containers.

As soon as such hardware technology is enabled in Linux, you have our commitment that Ubuntu will bring those features to end users faster than anyone else!

If you want to play with it today, you can certainly see the primitives within Ubuntu's LXC.  Launch Ubuntu containers within LXC and you'll start to get the general, low level idea.  If you want to view it from one layer above, give our new nova-compute-flex (flex was the code name, before it was released as LXD), a try.  It's publicly available as a tech preview in Ubuntu OpenStack Juno (authored by Chuck Short, Scott Moser, and James Page).  Here, you can launch OpenStack instances as LXC containers (rather than KVM virtual machines), as "general purpose" system instances.

Finally, perhaps lost in all of the activity here, is a couple of things we're doing different for the LXD project.  We at Canonical have taken our share of criticism over the years about choice of code hosting (our own Bazaar and Launchpad.net), our preferred free software licence (GPLv3/AGPLv3), and our contributor license agreement (Canonical CLA).   [For the record: I love bzr/Launchpad, prefer GPL/AGPL, and am mostly ambivalent on the CLA; but I won't argue those points here.]
  1. This is a public, community project under LinuxContainers.org
  2. The code and design documents are hosted on Github
  3. Under an Apache License
  4. Without requiring signatures of the Canonical CLA
These have been very deliberate, conscious decisions, lobbied for and won by our engineers leading the project, in the interest of collaborating and garnering the participation of communities that have traditionally shunned Canonical-led projects, raising the above objections.  I, for one, am eager to see contribution and collaboration that too often, we don't see.

Cheers!
:-Dustin

Read more
Dustin Kirkland

Say it with me, out loud.  Lex.  See.  Lex-see.  LXC.

Now, change the "see" to a "dee".  Lex.  Dee.  Lex-dee.  LXD.

Easy!

Earlier this week, here in Paris, at the OpenStack Design Summit, Mark Shuttleworth and Canonical introduced our vision and proof of concept for LXD.

You can find the official blog post on Canonical Insights, and a short video introduction on Youtube (by yours truly).

Our Canonical colleague Stephane Graber posted a bit more technical design detail here on the lxc-devel mailing list, which was picked up by HackerNews.  And LWN published a story yesterday covering another Canonical colleague of ours, Serge Hallyn, and his work on Cgroups and CGManager, all of which feeds into LXD.  As it happens, Stephane and Serge are upstream co-maintainers of Linux Containers.  Tycho Andersen, another colleague of ours, has been working on CRIU, which was the heart of his amazing demo this week, live migrating a container running the cult classic 1st person shooter, Doom! between two containers, back and forth.



Moreover, we've answered a few journalists' questions for excellent articles on ZDnet and SynergyMX.  Predictably, El Reg is skeptical (which isn't necessarily a bad thing).  But unfortunately, The Var Guy doesn't quite understand the technology (and unfortunately uses this article to conflate LXD with other random Canonical/Ubuntu complaints).

In any case, here's a bit more about LXD, in my own words...

Our primary design goal with LXD, is to extend containers into process based systems that behave like virtual machines.

We love KVM for its total machine abstraction, as a full virtualization hypervisor.  Moreover, we love what Docker does for application level development, confinement, packaging, and distribution.

But as an operating system and Linux distribution, our customers are, in fact, asking us for complete operating systems that boot and function within a Linux Container's execution space, natively.

Linux Containers are essential to our reference architecture of OpenStack, where we co-locate multiple services on each host.  Nearly every host is a Nova compute node, as well as a Ceph storage node, and also run a couple of units of "OpenStack overhead", such as MySQL, RabbitMQ, MongoDB, etc.  Rather than running each of those services all on the same physical system, we actually put each of them in their own container, with their own IP address, namespace, cgroup, etc.  This gives us tremendous flexibility, in the orchestration of those services.  We're able to move (migrate, even live migrate) those services from one host to another.  With that, it becomes possible to "evacuate" a given host, by moving each contained set of services elsewhere, perhaps a larger or smaller system, and then shut down the unit (perhaps to replace a hard drive or memory, or repurpose it entirely).

Containers also enable us to similarly confine services on virtual machines themselves!  Let that sink in for a second...  A contained workload is able, then, to move from one virtual machine to another, to a bare metal system.  Even from one public cloud provider, to another public or private cloud!

The last two paragraphs capture a few best practices that what we've learned over the last few years implementing OpenStack for some of the largest telcos and financial services companies in the world.  What we're hearing from Internet service and cloud providers is not too dissimilar...  These customers have their own customers who want cloud instances that perform at bare metal equivalence.  They also want to maximize the utilization of their server hardware, sometimes by more densely packing workloads on given systems.

As such, LXD is then a convergence of several different customer requirements, and our experience deploying some massively complex, scalable workloads (a la OpenStack, Hadoop, and others) in enterprises. 

The rapid evolution of a few key technologies under and around LXC have recently made this dream possible.  Namely: User namespaces, Cgroups, SECCOMP, AppArmorCRIU, as well as the library abstraction that our external tools use to manage these containers as systems.

LXD is a new "hypervisor" in that it provides (REST) APIs that can manage Linux Containers.  This is a step function beyond where we've been to date: able to start and stop containers with local commands and, to a limited extent, libvirt, but not much more.  "Booting" a system, in a container, running an init system, bringing up network devices (without nasty hacks in the container's root filesystem), etc. was challenging, but we've worked our way all of these, and Ubuntu boots unmodified in Linux Containers today.

Moreover, LXD is a whole new semantic for turning any machine -- Intel, AMD, ARM, POWER, physical, or even a virtual machine (e.g. your cloud instances) -- into a system that can host and manage and start and stop and import and export and migrate multiple collections of services bundled within containers.

I've received a number of questions about the "hardware assisted" containerization slide in my deck.  We're under confidentiality agreements with vendors as to the details and timelines for these features.

What (I think) I can say, is that there are hardware vendors who are rapidly extending some of the key features that have made cloud computing and virtualization practical, toward the exciting new world of Linux Containers.  Perhaps you might read a bit about CPU VT extensions, No Execute Bits, and similar hardware security technologies.  Use your imagination a bit, and you can probably converge on a few key concepts that will significantly extend the usefulness of Linux Containers.

As soon as such hardware technology is enabled in Linux, you have our commitment that Ubuntu will bring those features to end users faster than anyone else!

If you want to play with it today, you can certainly see the primitives within Ubuntu's LXC.  Launch Ubuntu containers within LXC and you'll start to get the general, low level idea.  If you want to view it from one layer above, give our new nova-compute-flex (flex was the code name, before it was released as LXD), a try.  It's publicly available as a tech preview in Ubuntu OpenStack Juno (authored by Chuck Short, Scott Moser, and James Page).  Here, you can launch OpenStack instances as LXC containers (rather than KVM virtual machines), as "general purpose" system instances.

Finally, perhaps lost in all of the activity here, is a couple of things we're doing different for the LXD project.  We at Canonical have taken our share of criticism over the years about choice of code hosting (our own Bazaar and Launchpad.net), our preferred free software licence (GPLv3/AGPLv3), and our contributor license agreement (Canonical CLA).   [For the record: I love bzr/Launchpad, prefer GPL/AGPL, and am mostly ambivalent on the CLA; but I won't argue those points here.]
  1. This is a public, community project under LinuxContainers.org
  2. The code and design documents are hosted on Github
  3. Under an Apache License
  4. Without requiring signatures of the Canonical CLA
These have been very deliberate, conscious decisions, lobbied for and won by our engineers leading the project, in the interest of collaborating and garnering the participation of communities that have traditionally shunned Canonical-led projects, raising the above objections.  I, for one, am eager to see contribution and collaboration that too often, we don't see.

Cheers!
:-Dustin

Read more
pitti

I’m on my way home from Düsseldorf where I attended the LinuxCon Europe and Linux Plumber conferences. I was quite surprised how huge LinuxCon was, there were about 1.500 people there! Certainly much more than last year in New Orleans.

Containers (in both LXC and docker flavors) are the Big Thing everybody talks about and works with these days; there was hardly a presentation where these weren’t mentioned at all, and (what felt like) half of the presentations were either how to improve these, or how to use these technologies to solve problems. For example, some people/companies really take LXC to the max and try to do everything in them including tasks which in the past you had only considered full VMs for, like untrusted third-party tenants. For example there was an interesting talk how to secure networking for containers, and pretty much everyone uses docker or LXC now to deploy workloads, run CI tests. There are projects like “fleet” which manage systemd jobs across an entire cluster of containers (distributed task scheduler) or like project-builder.org which auto-build packages from each commit of projects.

Another common topic is the trend towards building/shipping complete (r/o) system images, atomic updates and all that goodness. The central thing here was certainly “Stateless systems, factory reset, and golden images” which analyzed the common requirements and proposed how to implement this with various package systems and scenarios. In my opinion this is certainly the way to go, as our current solution on Ubuntu Touch (i. e. Ubuntu’s system-image) is far too limited and static yet, it doesn’t extend to desktops/servers/cloud workloads at all. It’s also a lot of work to implement this properly, so it’s certainly understandable that we took that shortcut for prototyping and the relatively limited Touch phone environment.

On Plumbers my main occupations were mostly the highly interesting LXC track to see what’s coming in the container world, and the systemd hackfest. On the latter I was again mostly listening (after all, I’m still learning most of the internals there..) and was able to work on some cleanups and improvements like getting rid of some of Debian’s patches and properly run the test suite. It was also great to sync up again with David Zeuthen about the future of udisks and some particular proposed new features. Looks like I’m the de-facto maintainer now, so I’ll need to spend some time soon to review/include/clean up some much requested little features and some fixes.

All in all a great week to meet some fellows of the FOSS world a gain, getting to know a lot of new interesting people and projects, and re-learning to drink beer in the evening (I hardly drink any at home :-P).

If you are interested you can also see my raw notes, but beware that there are mostly just scribbling.

Now, off to next week’s Canonical meeting in Washington, DC!

Read more
Stéphane Graber

I often have to deal with VPNs, either to connect to the company network, my own network when I’m abroad or to various other places where I’ve got servers I manage.

All of those VPNs use OpenVPN, all with a similar configuration and unfortunately quite a lot of them with overlapping networks. That means that when I connect to them, parts of my own network are no longer reachable or it means that I can’t connect to more than one of them at once.

Those I suspect are all pretty common issues with VPN users, especially those working with or for companies who over the years ended up using most of the rfc1918 subnets.

So I thought, I’m working with containers every day, nowadays we have those cool namespaces in the kernel which let you run crazy things as a a regular user, including getting your own, empty network stack, so why not use that?

Well, that’s what I ended up doing and so far, that’s all done in less than 100 lines of good old POSIX shell script :)

That gives me, fully unprivileged non-overlapping VPNs! OpenVPN and everything else run as my own user and nobody other than the user spawning the container can possibly get access to the resources behind the VPN.

The code is available at: git clone git://github.com/stgraber/vpn-container

Then it’s as simple as: ./start-vpn VPN-NAME CONFIG

What happens next is the script will call socat to proxy the VPN TCP socket to a UNIX socket, then a user namespace, network namespace, mount namespace and uts namespace are all created for the container. Your user is root in that namespace and so can start openvpn and create network interfaces and routes. With careful use of some bind-mounts, resolvconf and byobu are also made to work so DNS resolution is functional and we can start byobu to easily allow as many shell as you want in there.

In the end it looks like this:

stgraber@dakara:~/vpn$ ./start-vpn stgraber.net ../stgraber-vpn/stgraber.conf 
WARN: could not reopen tty: No such file or directory
lxc: call to cgmanager_move_pid_abs_sync(name=systemd) failed: invalid request
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 OpenVPN 2.3.2 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [eurephia] [MH] [IPv6] built on Feb  4 2014
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 WARNING: No server certificate verification method has been enabled.  See http://openvpn.net/howto.html#mitm for more info.
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 Attempting to establish TCP connection with [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:1194 [nonblock]
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 TCP connection established with [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:1194
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef]
Fri Sep 26 17:48:07 2014 TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:1194
Fri Sep 26 17:48:09 2014 [vorash.stgraber.org] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:1194
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 TUN/TAP device tun0 opened
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 Note: Cannot set tx queue length on tun0: Operation not permitted (errno=1)
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=1, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=1
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 /sbin/ip link set dev tun0 up mtu 1500
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 /sbin/ip addr add dev tun0 172.16.35.50/24 broadcast 172.16.35.255
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 /sbin/ip -6 addr add 2001:470:b368:1035::50/64 dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 /etc/openvpn/update-resolv-conf tun0 1500 1544 172.16.35.50 255.255.255.0 init
dhcp-option DNS 172.16.20.30
dhcp-option DNS 172.16.20.31
dhcp-option DNS 2001:470:b368:1020:216:3eff:fe24:5827
dhcp-option DNS nameserver
dhcp-option DOMAIN stgraber.net
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 add_route_ipv6(2607:f2c0:f00f:2700::/56 -> 2001:470:b368:1035::1 metric -1) dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 add_route_ipv6(2001:470:714b::/48 -> 2001:470:b368:1035::1 metric -1) dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 add_route_ipv6(2001:470:b368::/48 -> 2001:470:b368:1035::1 metric -1) dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 add_route_ipv6(2001:470:b511::/48 -> 2001:470:b368:1035::1 metric -1) dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 add_route_ipv6(2001:470:b512::/48 -> 2001:470:b368:1035::1 metric -1) dev tun0
Fri Sep 26 17:48:12 2014 Initialization Sequence Completed


To attach to this VPN, use: byobu -S /home/stgraber/vpn/stgraber.net.byobu
To kill this VPN, do: byobu -S /home/stgraber/vpn/stgraber.net.byobu kill-server
or from inside byobu: byobu kill-server

After that, just copy/paste the byobu command and you’ll get a shell inside the container. Don’t be alarmed by the fact that you’re root in there. root is mapped to your user’s uid and gid outside the container so it’s actually just your usual user but with a different name and with privileges against the resources owned by the container.

You can now use the VPN as you want without any possible overlap or conflict with any route or VPN you may be running on that system and with absolutely no possibility that a user sharing your machine may access your running VPN.

This has so far been tested with 5 different VPNs, on a regular Ubuntu 14.04 LTS system with all VPNs being TCP based. UDP based VPNs would probably just need a couple of tweaks to the socat unix-socket proxy.

Enjoy!

Read more
Dustin Kirkland


Docker 1.0.1 is available for testing, in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS!

Docker 1.0.1 has landed in the trusty-proposed archive, which we hope to SRU to trusty-updates very soon.  We would love to have your testing feedback, to ensure both upgrades from Docker 0.9.1, as well as new installs of Docker 1.0.1 behave well, and are of the highest quality you have come to expect from Ubuntu's LTS  (Long Term Stable) releases!  Please file any bugs or issues here.

Moreover, this new version of the Docker package now installs the Docker binary to /usr/bin/docker, rather than /usr/bin/docker.io in previous versions. This should help Ubuntu's Docker package more closely match the wealth of documentation and examples available from our friends upstream.

A big thanks to Paul Tagliamonte, James Page, Nick Stinemates, Tianon Gravi, and Ryan Harper for their help upstream in Debian and in Ubuntu to get this package updated in Trusty!  Also, it's probably worth mentioning that we're targeting Docker 1.1.2 (or perhaps 1.2.0) for Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic), which will release on October 23, 2014.

Here are a few commands that might help your testing...

Check What Candidate Versions are Available

$ sudo apt-get update
$ apt-cache show docker.io | grep ^Version:

If that shows 0.9.1~dfsg1-2 (as it should), then you need to enable the trusty-proposed pocket.

$ echo "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-proposed universe" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list
$ sudo apt-get update
$ apt-cache show docker.io | grep ^Version:

And now you should see the new version, 1.0.1~dfsg1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu0.14.04.1, available (probably in addition to 1.0.1~dfsg1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu0.14.04.1).

Upgrades

Check if you already have Docker installed, using:

$ dpkg -l docker.io

If so, you can simply upgrade.

$ sudo apt-get upgrade

And now, you can check your Docker version:

$ sudo dpkg -l docker.io | grep -m1 ^ii | awk '{print $3}'
0.9.1~dfsg1-2

New Installations

You can simply install the new package with:

$ sudo apt-get install docker.io

And ensure that you're on the latest version with:

$ dpkg -l docker.io | grep -m1 ^ii | awk '{print $3}'
1.0.1~dfsg1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu0.14.04.1

Running Docker

If you're already a Docker user, you probably don't need these instructions.  But in case you're reading this, and trying Docker for the first time, here's the briefest of quick start guides :-)

$ sudo docker pull ubuntu
$ sudo docker run -i -t ubuntu /bin/bash

And now you're running a bash shell inside of an Ubuntu Docker container.  And only bash!

root@1728ffd1d47b:/# ps -ef
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
root 1 0 0 13:42 ? 00:00:00 /bin/bash
root 8 1 0 13:43 ? 00:00:00 ps -ef

If you want to do something more interesting in Docker, well, that's whole other post ;-)

:-Dustin

Read more