Archive for June, 2010
Brad Figg
Meeting Minutes
IRC Log of the meeting.
Blog of the meeting minutes.
Agenda
2010-06-29 Meeting Agenda
Open action: manjo to send a firewire patch with test info
| manjo |
|
I believe pgraner tested this with kino and dvgrab and reported it to work. |
| manjo |
|
I had submitted a bzr patch making the switch to ubuntu kernel mailing list, |
| manjo |
|
waiting for tgardner or Keybuk to pick this up. |
| tgardner |
|
hmm, I think we’re still awaiting some test results |
| Keybuk |
|
hmm? I don’t do kernel stuff |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, test results from ? |
| tgardner |
|
Keybuk, its just a matter of swizzling some blacklists |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, results from pgraner et al |
| Keybuk |
|
ah, the old kansas city shuffle |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, ok |
| tgardner |
|
how about Luke’s audio supprt changes? |
| tgardner |
|
wasn’t there an app that needed updating? |
| manjo |
|
he was going to upgrade some of the audio packages |
| manjo |
|
and he volunteered to do it |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, has he done so? |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, I will check with him again today |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, once we have a synopsis of resul;ts, then I’ll make the blacklist changes |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, ack |
Open action: JFo to put out a CFT on new firewire stack
No status, JFo on vacation
Release Metrics
No status, JFo on vacation
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor
Synced latest upstreaming version of AA into Maverick. Marc Deslauriers already hit Bug #599450 which testing missed. I am looking at it and it should be a quick fix.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack
Covered in the open action item.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc
No status, apw on vacation
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts
The Lucid LTS backport kernel from Maverick continues to track the Maverick kernel.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel
no change. I just started looking at this again and will have a new test kernel today
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support
Nothing new, development work is done, should be removed from meeting schedule.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review
All Alpha2 work items are complete. Nothing new to report.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts
No status, apw on vacation
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling
No status, JFo on vacation
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart
No status, apw on vacation
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation
Changes to Firmware Test Suite this week:
7 Additional tests:
maxfreq: check CPU freq scaling max frequency against CPU max freq.
cstates: measure C states across CPUs and check activity when loaded
WMI: inspect DSDT for WMIs and dump out WMI methods and events (for hotkeys).
lid: interactive lid event detection test.
Other improvements + fixes:
klog scanning: use pcre rather than glibc regex.
Improved progress feedback (-p, --show-progress).
mtrr: check for MTRR config of VGA regions by BIOS.
mttr: fix prefetchable region detection bug
Add batch or interactive modes of testing.
Include 800+ example klog errors to test against.
Status: Maverick
We uploaded a last minute linux-2.6.35-6.8 Alpha2 kernel on Sunday to resolve bug 597904 which was a blocker for building Alpha2 arm images. We will essentially be uploading a 0-day Alpha2 kernel, linux-2.6.35-6.9, to resolve bug 588861. I’ve been given the green light to upload it late Wed. We currently have it uploaded to our kernel-ppa as an interim solution.
All of our team’s Alpha2 work items are complete, so good job everyone. Alpha 3 is Thurs Aug 5th which is a little over a month away. Please review the list of work items for Alpha 3:
ARM Status
- Marvel (mvl-dove):
Nothing new this week.
- Freescale (fsl-imx51):
Nothing new this week.
- Texas Instruments (ti-omap):
In Maverick, cooloney prepared a branch which includes some ASoC audio and
other fixes for git pull.
- Bugs:
cooloney went through the omap bug list, located here:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap.
Closed a bug to won't fix. Nothing new on other bugs.
Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others
Dapper: 2.6.15-55.84 (security)
Hardy: 2.6.24-28.70 (security)
2.6.24-28.71 (proposed)[11] 0 / 1 verifications done
Jaunty: 2.6.28-19.61 (security)
Karmic: 2.6.31-22.60 (security)
2.6.31-22.61 (waiting for approval)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-214.28 (security)
2.6.31-214.29 (waiting for approval)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-112.28 (security)
2.6.31-112.29 (waiting for approval)
- ec2 2.6.31-307.15 (security)
2.6.31-307.16 (waiting for approval)
Lucid: 2.6.32-22.36 (security)
2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[18] 14/39 verifications done
- LBM 2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[15] 3/ 3 verifications done
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-205.18 (security)
2.6.32-206.19 (proposed)[11] 13/41 verifications done (+ 1)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-608.14 (security)
2.6.31-608.15 (proposed)[11] 4/ 8 verifications done (+ 2)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-501.7 (security)
2.6.33-502.8 (proposed)[11] 0/ 4 verifications done
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-802.4 (security)
2.6.31-802.5 (proposed)[11] 1/ 5 verifications done
- ec2 2.6.32-306.11 (security)
2.6.32-307.12 (proposed)[11] 12/38 verifications done
- No feedback for ec2 boot tests (jjohanson?)
- All requested fsl-imx51 tests done.
-
One requested mvl-dove verification done. Two to go (ericm?):
-
No requested ti-omap verification done (mpoirier?). Still open:
It seems Martin was relatively happy with the current state so Lucid might move to updates at some point in the near future
Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats
No status, JFo on vacation
Incoming Bugs: Bug day report
No status, JFo on vacation
Open Discussion or Questions
| abogani2 |
|
I would want only inform you that I placed -lowlatency and -realtime kernel on Zinc and in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa) for review. Ever if anyone have time and chance to do it. |
| kamal |
|
regarding bug 594837 … |
| ubottu |
|
Launchpad bug 594837 in linux (Ubuntu) “Lucid SRU: Intel Core i3/i5/i7 hang on resume from suspend (SCI_EN)” [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/594837 |
| kamal |
|
still no response to the patch I submitted to stable@kernel.org 14 days ago: |
| kamal |
|
[PATCH] ACPI: Unconditionally set SCI_EN on resume |
| kamal |
|
should we continue to wait, or move forward with a Lucid SRU, or something else? |
| smb |
|
kamal, Greg seems to have re-surfaced recently |
| smb |
|
kamal, But you might re-ask |
| maks_ |
|
stable was on vacation. |
| kamal |
|
maybe I’ll give it another week then, thanks. |
| lag |
|
I’d like to request that the ARM Status item is brought forward i.e. placed nearer the top of the agenda. Otherwise; if the meeting goes on longer than 45-60mins I will be unable to present the item as I have to leave imminently for ‘other things’. |
| bjf |
|
lag, i have no problem with that |
| bjf |
|
lag, i’ll make it so |
| lag |
|
I don’t want to tread on anyone’s toes |
| bjf |
|
lag, it was an arbitrary decision on my part, i can change it |
| lag |
|
Great, thanks |
Brad Figg
Meeting Minutes
IRC Log of the meeting.
Blog of the meeting minutes.
Agenda
2010-06-22 Meeting Agenda
Open action item: manjo to send a patch with test info
Nothing new this week.
Open action item: jfo to put out a CFT on new firewire stack
This is holding for manjo’s test kernel which will likely land in Alpha3. This is also tracked in the frewire blueprint.
Release Metrics
Bugs
| |
| |
Alpha 2 Milestoned Bugs (17 (down 12)) |
Release Targeted Bugs (86 across all packages (up 3)) |
|
| linux |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Milestoned Features
* 13 blueprints (Including HWE blueprints)
Bugs with Patches Attached:111 (down 6 from last week)
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor
No progress from last week. Doing the testing now
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack
Nothing new this week.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc
The debian commonisation is progressing well, Lucid and Maverick are both applied. Karmic is still pending approval. The TI-OMAP4 preliminary kernel has now been created and pushed to the repository.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts
Uploaded Ubuntu-lts-2.6.35-5.6 this morning to the kernel-ppa at http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ppa/ubuntu. Submitted upstream patch to deprecate a netfilter config option CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT which will have an impact on Lucid userspace when the 11.04 kernel is backported.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel
Ported over the latest .34 Xen patchset, it currently has some issues, so we will stay with Lucid EC2 kernel until they are resolved.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support
trace-cmd and kernelshark have been uploaded as of 2 hrs ago, feel free to give it a spin! Our version of perf probe now also supports the new -s option for specifying the source directory. This blueprint is pretty much fulfilled in terms of development. JFo has a task for looking at arsenal scripting responses for ftraceable bugs, but that’s all. A todo task has been added to the [[http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Arsenal|kernel team's arsenal script todo list]].
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review
2 of the usb sauce patches I pushed upstream to remove duplicate id’s are now in gregkh-2.6 tree. Per feedback on linux-wireless ml, I fixed up and resent the p54usb patch to comment out a duplicate id. I also resent the ipw2200 enable led by default patch with TJ’s official SOB. These last two are still pending acceptance.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts
The union mounts patches have been revised and are now at 2.6.34, however they are looking to be still undergoing heavy churn and review. I do not see them being ready for our use within the timescales required. We should probabally consider assuming it will not make it.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling
- apw and I will be reworking the Triage section of the wiki. I’ll be adding a page for the BugDays and moving over some relevant information from the old ones, but generally leaving legacy information there.
- The forum moderators are excited to be helping us address kernel related forum topics as well as bugs filed due to comments in the forums. More to come on this
- I’ve sent out an initial inquiry out to gauge the interest in the proposed kernel triage summit. So far the response has been immensely positive. the X community is involved and it seems that there is a great deal of interest in the classes on specific subsystems. I also sent out a call for experts to address some of the subsystems that have a separate component outside the kernel such as X and audio specifically. I’ll send out some more specific e-mails as time goes on to gather subject experts for the classes.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart
The initargs patches have now been tested, updated and pushed to the Maverick kernels. The ureadahead patches remain untested.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation
Changes to Firmware Test Suite this week:
Add in heurstic driven advice when detecting errors (lots of textual help)
Lots of code tidy up (fix memory leaks, func return values), tested with valgrind
Add in generic CPU identification code
Automate debian packaging from git repo
Put in PPA http://ppa.launchpad.net/firmware-testing-team/ppa-firmware-test-suite
Scan ~2870 kernel logs from LP, extract errors, tune klog scanner to detect these errors.
Regex pattern matching on log scanning (slower, more flexible though)
Status: Maverick
We just uploaded the linux-2.6.35-5.6 kernel yesterday. This primarily contains kernel config changes, so please test. Alpha 2 is Thurs July 1 (ie ~1week from today). You should be finalizing any work items you have or pushing them out to Alpha3 if they’re not Alpha2 release critical. Note that we’re currently above the trend line in our Alpha 2 burn down chart so get those items closed or moved asap!
Also, if you have any patches which you want to land in the Alpha2 kernel, they need to be sent to the kernel-team ml and have garnered the appropriate Ack’s before this Fri, June 25. I plan to upload our final Alpha2 kernel Thursday afternoon/Friday morning PST (UTC-7).
ARM Status
-
Marvel (mvl-dove) :
-
mvl-dove branch in lucid has been updated to sync with the latest Marvell
Dove LSP 5.2.1 (mostly fixes), as well as one additional fix to the resume
failure from hibernation.
-
Freescale (fsl-imx51):
-
Nothing new this week; however, cooloney indicates that smb may have completed
some work to upload the kernel to -proposed.
-
Texas Instruments (ti-omap):
-
A new topic branch named ti-omap4 was merged into Maverick. It is based on TI
2.6.34 omap4 kernel tree. rtg also helped to pull the branch and sync the Debian
packaging stuff with our Maverick master branch. TI said they will provide a
2.6.35-rc based omap4 tree to our Maverick in the middle of Aug.
Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others
Hardy: 2.6.24-28.70 (security)
2.6.24-28.71 (proposed)[ 4] 0 / 1 verifications done
Jaunty: 2.6.28-19.61 (security)
Karmic: 2.6.31-22.60 (security)
2.6.31-22.61 (waiting for approval)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-214.28 (security)
2.6.31-214.29 (waiting for approval)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-112.28 (security)
2.6.31-112.29 (waiting for approval)
- ec2 2.6.31-307.15 (security)
2.6.31-307.16 (waiting for approval)
Lucid: 2.6.32-22.36 (security)
2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[11] 14/39 verifications done (+ 6)
- LBM 2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[ 8] 3/ 3 verifications done (+ 2)
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-205.18 (security)
2.6.32-206.19 (proposed)[ 4] 12/41 verifications done (+12)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-608.14 (security)
2.6.31-608.15 (proposed)[ 4] 2/ 4 verifications done (+ 2)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-501.7 (security)
2.6.33-502.8 (proposed)[ 4] 0/ 4 verifications done
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-802.4 (security)
2.6.31-802.5 (proposed)[ 4] 1/ 5 verifications done (+ 1)
- ec2 2.6.32-306.11 (security)
2.6.32-307.12 (proposed)[ 4] 12/38 verifications done (+12)
For the various ARM topic branches, people with testing HW need to make sure
that beside of generic boot tests, they verify their specific bugs:
-
mvl-dove
-
fsl-imx51
-
ti-omap
-
ec2 has no specific changes
Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats
Incoming Bugs:
| |
Version |
Count |
|
| |
Maverick |
28 (+5) |
|
| |
Lucid |
980 (+30) |
|
Current regression stats:
| |
Version |
Potential |
Update |
Release |
Proposed |
| |
maverick |
12 (+4) |
|
|
|
|
| |
lucid |
223 (?) |
34 (+4) |
142 (+6) |
1 |
|
| |
karmic |
|
6 |
46 (-2) |
1 |
|
| |
jaunty |
|
4 |
19 |
|
|
| |
hardy |
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
Incoming Bugs: Bug day report
Today’s bug day will be focusing on working Confirmed bugs and getting them to either Incomplete, by way of testing or information requests, or Triaged based on the completeness of the bug. My goal is to work through all of the Confirmed bugs to get them in the correct state. The Team Bug Days will continue to be the two half days on Friday and Monday. Please provide me feedback on these as you have it. Next week’s bug day will be two-fold. On the one hand, we will change the remaining lucid regression-potential bugs to regression release. On the other hand, we will be reviewing the incorrectly labeled new bugs that need to be some other status based on either response by the bug reporter or the inclusion of requested logging.
Open Discussion or Questions:
Just a reminder that we are all meant to be helping with the wiki gardening effort … this needs to be basically complete by the end of the platform sprint. There is a long todo of small items people can help out with. For the date & time challenged that is 23 July. The wiki todo page.
Brad Figg
Meeting Minutes
IRC Log of the meeting.
Agenda
2010-06-15 Meeting Agenda
Release Metrics
Bugs
| |
| |
Alpha 2 Milestoned Bugs (29 (up 24)) |
Release Targeted Bugs (83 across all packages (up 33)) |
|
| linux |
10 |
17 |
|
|
Milestoned Features
13 blueprints (Includes HWE Blueprints)
Bugs with Patches Attached:117 (down 5 from last week)
Launchpad report of bugs with patches.
Breakdown of bugs with patches
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor
Slow progress – updated compatibility code, need to do testing and send out pull request when done
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack
Nothing to report
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc
The debian commonisation is progressing well, both Karmic and Lucid branch sets have been converted over. There is some resistance to applying these changes to Karmic currently as they are very hard to review and seen as perhaps outside the SRU process; discussions are ongoing but we may have to abandon doing this for Karmic. We have also mothballed a no longer used branch in Karmic, the netbook branch.
”’Question:”’ “Does this lift a hold on lucid patches against mvl-dove?”
”’Answer:”’ Yes, it appears to and we think the Marvell, lucid patches are in the tree and awaiting upload.”
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts
The LTS backport kernel and meta packages at http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ppa/ubuntu are up to 2.6.35-3.4 (tracking the latest maverick kernel release). All appears well. In fact, its much better then the previous 2.6.35-rc2 based release which had some memory corrupter bugs.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel
pv-on-HVM drivers don’t help us out Karmic pv-ops kernel on EC2 is more flaky than it was in the Karmic cycle (only successfully booted in 1 of 4 availability zones). Lucid pv-ops is boot in 2 of 4 availability zones on last test. Maverick wasn’t booting at all under 2.6.35.2, have tried it with the latest config changes made pulled forward from Lucid and haven’t tried .3 yet. Current plan is revert to full Xen topic branch, and get other work items done and return to pv-ops kernel in a few weeks.
”’Question:”’ “Wasn’t there a middle option? The drivers only?”
”’Answer:”’ “The drivers are the pv-ops-HVM.”
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support
Patch sent upstream for perf probe under review. I’ve packaged trace-cmd and kernelshark, sent three patches upstream for them (2 trace-cmd, 1 kernel). Will work on getting them into Maverick.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review
I pushed 3 of our sauce patches upstream which just removed some duplicate device id’s. I’ve also dropped 2 more sauce patches which added MODULE_ALIAS for the Dell WMI module and the other which sent events on data interface as well as master interface for the hostap driver.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts
Waiting on testing from Foundations from updated kernels. Need to get the tools updated for this and uploaded to the same PPA, hoping to have those tommorrow.
| tgardner |
|
ogasawara, you got some pushback on one of those removals. what came of that? |
| ogasawara |
|
tgardner: hrm, I didn’t see any reply. |
| ogasawara |
|
tgardner: I’ll have to look into it |
| tgardner |
|
ogasawara, the one with duplicate IDs |
| ogasawara |
|
tgardner: I’m not subscribed to the upstream list so I wonder if I wasn’t CC’d on the reply? |
| tgardner |
|
ogasawara, likely |
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling
| Conversation with the Forums people has begun, they are talking internally to gather some thoughts on our proposal concerning the discussion between us to improve the quality of the information on the forums. They will be gettting back with me late this week or next week and we will go from there. |
| |
| I have tested the SHA1 gathering script several times now. It will likely not be as useful as i thought due to the fact that the janitor puts a comment containing the SHA1 of the fix that solves an issue in bugs that potentially have multiple tasks, thus giving us false positives. I am working to define the problem before I see if we can modify the script to react to those comments appropriately. |
| |
| I sent out the initial e-mail to get an idea of the interest level for a Kernel Triager Summit. Based on the response, I will begin the further planning items needed to make this a reality. |
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart
Waiting on testing from Foundation from updates kernels. Expecting preliminary feedback on Wednesday.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation
Added the following functionality to the firmware test suite:
Battery Test: Exercise CPU to drain quicker
Kernel Version checking
Include Blank Test Template
Re-organise klog scanning, added more intelligence
Logging: Add line numbering, test failure levels, summary of failures, improved automatic text formatting
Add --no-s3 --no-s4 options to ignore suspend/hibernate tests
Check for redundant _OSI(Linux)
HPET sanity check vendor ID
Syntax check SSDT tables
Virtualisation extention checks
Add in MCFG test
General bug fixing and code tidying
Status: Maverick
We’ve rebased to 2.6.35-rc3 which should be available as of linux-2.6.35-3.4. Please test. Alpha 2 is Thurs July 1 (ie ~2weeks from today) so make sure you’re on track with any work items that need doing as we’re currently above the trend line in our Alpha 2 burn down chart: Also keep in mind that if you have any patches which you want to land in the Alpha2 kernel, they need to be sent to the kernel-team ml and have garnered the appropriate Ack’s *before* Fri Jun 25. I’ll send an email reminder this Friday.
Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others
Dapper: 2.6.15-55.84 (security)
Hardy: 2.6.24-28.70 (security)
2.6.24-28.71 (waiting for approval)
Jaunty: 2.6.28-19.61 (security)
Karmic: 2.6.31-22.60 (security)
2.6.31-22.61 (waiting for approval)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-214.28 (security)
2.6.31-214.29 (waiting for approval)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-112.28 (security)
2.6.31-112.29 (waiting for approval)
- ec2 2.6.31-307.15 (security)
2.6.31-307.16 (waiting for approval)
Lucid: 2.6.32-22.36 (security)
2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[4] 8/39 verifications done (+ 8)
- LBM 2.6.32-23.37 (proposed)[1] 1/ 3 verifications done (+ 1)
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-205.18 (security)
2.6.32-206.19 (waiting for approval)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-608.14 (security)
2.6.31-608.15 (waiting for approval)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-501.7 (security)
2.6.33-502.8 (waiting for approval)
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-802.4 (security)
2.6.31-802.5 (waiting for approval)
- ec2 2.6.32-306.11 (security)
2.6.32-307.12 (waiting for approval)
As we found out today there is resistance on the current changes in Karmic which only affect the build infrastructure. This needs to be resolved before the uploads will be accepted into proposed.
Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats
Incoming Bugs:
| |
Version |
Count |
|
| |
Maverick |
23 (+8) |
|
| |
Lucid |
950 (+4) |
|
Current regression stats:
| |
Version |
Potential |
Update |
Release |
Proposed |
| |
maverick |
8 (+1) |
|
|
|
|
| |
lucid |
223 (-11;) |
30 (+5) |
136 (+8) |
1 |
|
| |
karmic |
|
6 (-3) |
48 (-2) |
1 |
|
| |
jaunty |
|
4 (-1) |
19 (-1) |
|
|
| |
hardy |
|
1 |
2 (-1) |
|
|
Incoming Bugs: Bug day report
I neglected to announce the Bug Day scheduled for today last week due to travel for the SELF conference. That Bug Day will be held next week. The next bug day will be next Tuesday. We will be focusing on working Confirmed bugs and getting them to either Incomplete, by way of testing or information requests, or Triaged based on the completeness of the bug. My goal is to work through all of the Confirmed bugs to get them in the correct state and work but the best method for them based on conversation with Andy last week. I am happy with the progress of the Team bug day so far. I’d like to hold this again this week. I am open to continuing the two half days on Friday and Monday again if there is no objection.
”’Question:”’ “Are you all still finding the half day Kernel team days on friday and monday useful?”
”’Answer:”’ “Though not everyone has been able to participate as much as they’d like, they do like the split and we’ll continue to see if the idea gets traction.”
Open Discussion or Questions:
| ogasawara |
|
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-maverick-xorg-gpu-freeze-reports |
| ogasawara |
|
There are 3 Alpha2 work items assigned to the canonical-kernel-team in |
| ogasawara |
|
that blueprint. |
| ogasawara |
|
sconklin, could I persuade you to own those 3 work items? It looked like |
| ogasawara |
|
you and apw attended this UDS session but apw seems to have enough |
| ogasawara |
|
Alpha2 work items on his plate. |
| sconklin |
|
looking |
| ogasawara |
|
while you’re looking, the other item was https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-uefi-support |
| ogasawara |
|
This also has an Alpha2 work item assigned to canonical-kernel-team, |
| ogasawara |
|
“Investigate situation with Intel graphics drivers on EFI”. |
| ogasawara |
|
cking or tgardner, did either of you attend this UDS session? Can I get |
| ogasawara |
|
one of you to own this work item? |
| sconklin |
|
ogasawara: sure, I can take those |
| cking |
|
ogasawara, nope, it clashed with something else I had to attend |
| ogasawara |
|
sconklin: thanks, much appreciated. |
| tgardner |
|
ogasawara, I volunteer cking as he’s already involved with EFI |
| sconklin |
|
I’ll edit the blueprint now |
| ogasawara |
|
cking: thanks |
| phunge0 |
|
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/585092 |
| ubottu |
|
Launchpad bug 585092 in linux (Ubuntu) “tmpfs umount slowdown” [Medium,Triaged] |
| phunge0 |
|
Could I get some feedback on prospects for this bug in lucid? Upstream devs think they have a real fix to the problem (2nd try), it’s been posted to lkml but won’t be merged until 2.6.35-rc4 at earliest (when Linus gets back from vacation). I’m wondering if backporting it would be considered feasible. If not I’m hoping the workaround could be revisited, it has serious performance downsides. |
| phunge0 |
|
Please let me know if there’s someone specific I should be talking to. |
| tgardner |
|
phunge0, is this so critical that you can’t wait 2 weeks for it to show up in due course? |
| smb |
|
I believe last time they had a fix they reverted it due to hangs in xfs |
| bjf |
|
phunge0, it looks like we are waiting to see what upstream wants to do about it |
| smb |
|
But it was one of the things I wanted to investigate |
| phunge0 |
|
ok |
| apw |
|
phunge0, do we have a poninter to the outstanding conversation on that |
| phunge0 |
|
it’s not critical, but my firm was hoping to migrate to lucid with the SRU |
| phunge0 |
|
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/10/259 |
| apw |
|
to the ‘new’ fix? make it easier for us to track when it hits maverick so we can test |
| phunge0 |
|
and this blocks us |
| apw |
|
phunge0, thanks |
| apw |
|
phunge0, us ? |
| phunge0 |
|
this is the patchset http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/10/175 |
| phunge0 |
|
my firm, sorry |
| tgardner |
|
phunge0, it remains to be seen if Jens fix is gonna do the trick |
| apw |
|
phunge0, thats like 13 patches! |
| tgardner |
|
apw, maybe we can get it via stable |
| apw |
|
tgardner, fingers crossed |
| phunge0 |
|
yeah, this is linus indicating that it might be acceptable for 2.6.35 |
| smb |
|
We might but that will certainly take time |
| apw |
|
cirtainly we should help test it in 35 |
| phunge0 |
|
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/10/285 |
| phunge0 |
|
but he pushed back |
| manjo |
|
can we get some feed back on the firewire stack switch? I think its a matter of blacklisting old modules and whitelisting new ones |
| manjo |
|
blacklist ohci1394 sbp2 eth1394 dv1394 raw1394 video1394 and whitelist firewire-ohci firewire-sbp2 firewire-core firewire-net in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire.conf. As far as I can see this is the only real change that needs to happen to make this switch. |
| manjo |
|
I emailed ubuntu-devel and ubuntu-kernel |
| manjo |
|
and I don’t have any response yet |
| manjo |
|
ie switch from old firewire stack to new stack |
| apw |
|
so i’d recommend you ask on #ubuntu-devel about this as well |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, did your email include a patch? |
| apw |
|
there are some old hands there who can probabally help guide us as to the next step |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, no, I thought we talked about this a while back and |
| manjo |
|
foundations need to make that change ? |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, we can do it as well. we have before |
| manjo |
|
I am happy to send a patch |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, to ubuntu-kernel ? |
| apw |
|
manjo, do we have the alternate userspace stack available ? |
| tgardner |
|
I want some test results too. |
| apw |
|
(i thought there was one if you switched?) |
| manjo |
|
yep we have both moduels built as of now |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, yep, ubuntu-kernel list |
| apw |
|
manjo, i meant the userspace integration, does it work with both ? |
| apw |
|
s/both/either |
| tgardner |
|
apw, thats what I meant by test results |
| manjo |
|
apw, there was a bug for which the switch was tested |
| manjo |
|
but I can send a patch with test info |
| tgardner |
|
manjo, just put the results in the bug |
| apw |
|
sounds good then … |
| JFo |
|
I think we need a gneral CFT on the new stack then |
| manjo |
|
tgardner, will do |
| tgardner |
|
JFo, good idea |
| manjo |
|
bjf, can you action me |
| manjo |
|
so that I have this info for the next meeting |
| manjo |
|
for/before |
| JFo |
|
bjf, action me as well for the sending of the CFT |
| bjf |
|
[ACTION] manjo to send a patch with test info |
| JFo |
|
manjo, I’ll send it once you let me know it is built and where the test kernel is. |
| bjf |
|
[ACTION] jfo to put out a CFT on new firewire stack |
| JFo |
|
thanks bjf |
| kamal |
|
Regarding bug 553498 |
| ubottu |
|
Launchpad bug 553498 in linux (Ubuntu Lucid) “Intel Core i3/i5/i7 hang on resume from suspend (SCI_EN)” [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/553498 |
| kamal |
|
We have this marked as Fix Committed for Lucid, but the fix in Lucid (my original patch) only helps Dell Studio 155x machines, so isn’t really sufficient. |
| kamal |
|
I would like to get M. Garrett’s better version of the fix (“Unconditionally set SCI_EN”, as it exists now in Maverick) pulled into Lucid so we can fix this for all i3/i5/i7 machines. |
| kamal |
|
What is the procedure? |
| apw |
|
kamal, propose it as an SRU patch in the normal way |
| apw |
|
send it to the kernel-team list etc |
| tgardner |
|
that one seems like a good stable update patch |
| kamal |
|
ok, will do — can I change the bug state from “Fix Committed” back to “In Progress” or something also? |
| smb |
|
Would there be chance that GregKH accepts it into stable upstream? |
| tgardner |
|
smb reads my mind |
| apw |
|
cirtainly worth asking … |
| bjf |
|
kamal, you can also open a new bug just for the purposes of SRU, point back at the other bug |
| smb |
|
kamal, as bjf suggest |
| kamal |
|
bjf, ok I’ll open a whole new bug for this — should I ask GregKH about this directly? |
| smb |
|
Sounds strange that the bug only closes dell but is named generically |
| kamal |
|
the bug was originally titled “Dell Studio …” but I changed it after realizing that it affected all (?) i3/i5/i7 machines |
| apw |
|
kamal, yeah we should get the title of the dell only bug fixed to be dell only and make the new one generic |
| smb |
|
kamal, I wonder whether I have not written some notes how to do |
| smb |
|
kamal, let me dig and get back to you |
| kamal |
|
apw: ok, that makes sense re: the bug titling. |
| kamal |
|
smb: I’ll wait for your notes. |
| kamal |
|
thanks folks |
Brad Figg
Meeting Minutes
IRC Log of the meeting.
Agenda
2010-06-08 Meeting Agenda
Release Metrics
Bugs
| |
| |
Alpha 2 Milestoned Bugs (5) |
Release Targeted Bugs (50 across all packages (up 10)) |
|
| linux |
1 |
3 |
|
|
Milestoned Features
- 14 blueprints (includes HWE blueprints)
Bugs with Patches Attached:122 (down 6 from last week)
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor
Started cross testing of compatibility patch and found some errors that need to fixed before it can be pulled in. Will try to get that cleaned up today so we can pull in the latest version, and send it upstream.
Caching patch fix – no progress still sitting on the back burner behind cold, compatibility patch, and EC2.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack
Nothing new this week.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc
The two items slipped out of Alpha-1 are still outstanding, though neither is a release task. The debian commonisation is currently progressing with Karmic master being retrofitted currently. We expect to have Karmic and Lucid master both complete by Wednesday, ready for test uploads.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts
The Lucid LTS backport kernel is tracking Maverick at http://ppa.launchpad.net/kernel-ppa/ppa/ubuntu.
The current kernel and meta versions are linux-maverick-2.6.35-1.1~lucid1 and linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick-2.6.35.1.6.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel
pv-ops kernel has so far not been working out, and I am following up with Amazon.
Started looking at fallback plan 1 of pv-on-HVM driver but I haven’t been able to successfully build them yet (failing in the ballon driver atm). I need to test building them on an older stock kernel yet.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support
I (cnd) sent a patch upstream for relative source paths for perf probe, waiting on feedback
I took a closer look at trace-cmd and kernelshark and I’m not convinced quite yet that we really need kernelshark so I may just package up trace-cmd when I get the chance.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review
I (ogasawara) own the majority of the Alpha2 work items so will start closing those out shortly.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts
Waiting on testing from Foundations from updated kernels. As part of the roll forward to v2.6.35-rc1 we have had to update AUFS2 as it no longer built. We expect to have to update it again before v2.6.35 final regardless of whether union-mounts make it.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling
Good progress on the wiki. There is now a Todo located at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/WikiToDo and a wiki gardening guide at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/WikiGardening Please use these references when working on the wiki pages.
Thanks to apw for getting those up and going
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart
We have patches pending for the remaining Alpha-1 deliverable, waiting on testing from Foundations. We have also pulled forward the ‘readahead was used’ patches from Lucid testing to Maverick and pushed those to a further PPA for testing.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-reducing-dkms-packages-required-for-hardware-enablement
Outcome was that “Tiger team” to discuss this to be set up by awe. This will be removed from the meeting agenda.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation
Added the following functionality to the firmware test suite:
ACPI MCFG table test
MTRR tests
HPET sanity checks
Simple Fan tests
ACPI FADT table checks
Simple Battery tests
PCI Max Read Req sanity check
BIOS EBDA check
Misc:
Add in e820 region checking
Generalised list handling
Fix iasl + pipe I/O bug
Re-organise lib headers
Status: Maverick
We uploaded the 2.6.35-1.1 kernel which rebased us to 2.6.35-rc1. I’ll be uploading 2.6.35-2.2 within the hour. This will rebase us to 2.6.35-rc2. Please test if you are able to. Also, just a general reminder that Alpha 2 is Thurs July 1 (ie ~3weeks from today) so make sure you’re on track with any work items that need doing.
Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others
Dapper: 2.6.15-55.84 (security)
Hardy: 2.6.24-28.70 (security)
Jaunty: 2.6.28-19.61 (security)
Karmic: 2.6.31-22.60 (security)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-214.28 (security)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-112.28 (security)
- ec2 2.6.31-307.15 (security)
Lucid: 2.6.32-22.36 (security)
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-205.18 (security)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-608.14 (security)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-501.7 (security)
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-802.4 (security)
- ec2 2.6.32-306.11 (security)
- LBM 2.6.32-22.15 (waiting for acceptance to proposed)
The initial security release for Lucid caused a regression for KVM. Though the same patch is in Karmic and Jaunty without problems. It has been reverted for Lucid and an additional upload was made (thanks apw).
The current update to Lucid qcm-msm will be the last one as we lack testing hardware.
Currently preparing proposed uploads to Lucid and Karmic and while being on those, updating the abstracted debian implementation (apw). Lucid proposed will contain upstream stable 2.6.32.11-15 and 2.6.33.3-5 for DRM (amongst a lot of other changes). Target for upload to proposed for the master branch is Wednesday.
Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats
Incoming Bugs:
| |
Version |
Count |
|
| |
Maverick |
15 (+10) |
|
| |
Lucid |
946 (-59) |
|
Current regression stats:
| |
Version |
Potential |
Update |
Release |
Proposed |
| |
maverick |
7 (+2) |
|
|
|
|
| |
lucid |
234 (-28;) |
25 (-1) |
128 (-18) |
1 |
|
| |
karmic |
|
9 |
50 |
1 |
|
| |
jaunty |
|
5 |
20 |
|
|
| |
hardy |
|
1 |
3 |
|
|
Incoming Bugs: Bug day report
The next bug day will be next Tuesday. We will be focusing on working Confirmed bugs and getting them to either Incomplete, by waay of testing or information requests, or Triaged based on the completeness of the bug. My goal is to work through all of the Confirmed bugs to get them in the correct state and work out the best method for addressing them based on conversation with Andy yesterday. I also want to have a Team bug day much like we did this week to work the Top 50 list. I am open to having be two half days on Friday and Monday again if that worked out for everyone last time.
Any suggestions/objections? Was the two half days more useful than one whole one?
- (ogasawara)I like the half days
- (apw)I think half is better over all as its easier to do one or the other
Open Discussion or Questions: Anyone have anything?
| apw |
Just a reminder that the wiki update is a team task, please do look over the ToDo and see if there are things you know about and can help clean up |
| manjo |
Is there a pointer (url) to the todo? |
| apw |
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/WikiToDo |
| |
|
| JFo |
Just wanted to mention that I have been invited to the QA meeting tomorrow to discuss the Triage Summit |
| JFo |
So I suspect there will be some more chat on it and I will be sending out an e-mail this week to kick things off |
Brad Figg
Meeting Minutes
IRC Log of the meeting.
Agenda
2010-6-1 Meeting Agenda
Maverick Release Metrics
Bugs
| |
Alpha 1 Milestoned Bugs (0) |
Release Targeted Bugs (40 accross all packages) |
| linux |
0 |
5 |
Blueprints
- 14 Blueprints (includes HWE blueprints)
Bugs with Patches Attached: 130 (down 2 from last week)
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-apparmor (jjohansen)
Nothing new this week.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-firewire-stack (manjo)
Nothing new this week.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-misc (apw)
There are two outstanding items for Alpha-1, getting mainline builds to include linux-tools and progressing the -preempt pakcages. These are both non-release tasks. The first is likely to slip to alpha-2 now, the second is progresing but also likely to slip.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-new-kernel-on-lts (tgardner)
LTS backport kernel and meta package are in the kernel-ppa. Its tracking maverick as its released.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-pv-ops-ec2-kernel (jjohansen)
Slow progress, more testing without success. Will have to try pv-ops on HVM drivers this week.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-tracing-support (cnd)
Kernel config is set, confirmed with upstream. No new work other than that yet.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-ubuntu-delta-review (ogasawara)
There are only two work items still open for Alpha-1, both of which are not critical for Alpha-1′s release.
apw, manjo: if you don’t think you’ll get to those before Thurs, I’ll move them under the Alpha-2 milestone.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-union-mounts (apw)
Still no testing feedback from foundations on union-mounts, there is talk of another drop occuring from upstream which will simplify the patches. It is unclear when this new drop will occur however.
We also have an issue with aufs2 in maverick which is leading to aufs2 panics during boot on the live-cd. I have an update for aufs2 which I am attempting to test to see if that fixes the issues. It is likely we will have to update aufs2 as soon as we are on 2.6.35-rcN. The update does appear to be good, and we are being asked to respin with aufs2 updated. Will get patches out shortly.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bug-handling (jfo)
Continuing work on the wiki pages with input from apw, ogasawara and smb. I plan to send some e-mail out on the ongoing effort today.
Also, I have some prep work happening that will move several topics to INPROGRESS.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-upstart (apw)
We have patches pending for the remaining Alpha-1 deliverable, waiting on testing from Foundations. These would most readily be applied post Alpha-1.
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-reducing-dkms-packages-required-for-hardware-enablement (cking)
Nothing new this week
Blueprint: kernel-maverick-bios-test-automation (cking)
* Added functionality:
* Test for common BIOS error messages
* APIC edge/level trigger test
* acpiinfo: common kernel log ACPI checks
* Common S3/S4 PM kernel error checks
* S3 multiple suspend/resume cycle tests
* S4 hibernate/resume test
* Add in test run order/priority
* Rework kernel log scanning + execution of some user space tools
* Rework wakealarm code into common library calls
* Add ability to take pre-captured input from dmidecode, /proc/acpi/dsdt and dmesg rather than at run time
* Manoj added a test from the test suite into kernel-qa dev to prove the test suite integrates in okay.
Status: Maverick (ogasawara)
We uploaded the 2.6.34-5.12 Alpha 1 kernel last Friday. There will be no further uploads until after Thurs. Unfortunately the first iso’s were just spun yesterday and have uncovered 2 bugs we need to be aware of (thanks apw and tgardner for already taking ownership):
I should take that back, we might upload for the aufs bits. Also note that 2.6.35-rc1 was released so I’ll be rebasing Maverick today.
Security & bugfix kernels – Karmic/Jaunty/Intrepid/Hardy/Others (gnarl/smb)
* Dapper: 2.6.15-55.83 (updates)
* Hardy: 2.6.24-27.69 (updates)
* Intrepid: --- End of Support ---
* Jaunty: 2.6.28-18.60 (updates)
* Karmic: 2.6.31-21.59 (updates)
- mvl-dove 2.6.31-213.27 (updates)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-111.27 (updates)
- ec2 2.6.31-306.14 (updates)
* Lucid: 2.6.32-22.33 (updates)
- mvl-dove 2.6.32-204.16 (release)
- fsl-imx51 2.6.31-607.13 (release)
- ti-omap 2.6.33-500.6 (release)
- qcm-msm 2.6.31-800.2 (release)
- ec2 2.6.32-305.9 (release)
Status unchanged from last week. Security release nearly out (probably tomorrow).
Incoming Bugs and Regression Stats
Incoming Bugs:
| Version |
Count |
| Maverick |
5 (+1) |
| Lucid |
1005 (-129) |
Current regression stats:
| Version |
Potential |
Update |
Release |
Proposed |
| maverick |
5 (+2) |
|
|
|
| lucid |
262 (-40;) |
26 (+1) |
146 (-3) |
1 |
| karmic |
|
9 |
50 |
1 |
| jaunty |
|
5 |
20 |
|
| hardy |
|
1 (-1) |
3 |
|
Incoming Bugs: Bug day report (JFo)
This week’s Bug Day will be on Thursday. I plan to send out an announcement for it later today with a reminder going out tomorrow. The current plan is to review Bugs with Patches attached to eliminate misreported patches and prepare the list for team review. Additionally, i will resume our use of the ‘cherry-pick’ tag to identify bugs with upstream commit SHA1s in them for us to review and react accordingly. You can see the list of these from this url
Open Discussion or Questions: Anyone have anything? (raise your hand please)
| jfo |
Just wanted to draw your attention here |
| |
|
| bjf |
Pointing to here |
| |
|
| apw |
Remember we discussed the b43 driver not working, i’ve confirmed that it does not work in the current release kernel in lucid due to dma errors, etc. |
| |
With smb’s latest stable 32.13 the b43 does work pretty well, and i am using it now |
| tgardner |
Is compat-wireless any better? |
| apw |
Can’t say i’ve tried it no |
|
Pages
Labels
|